Re: [TLS] draft-sheffer-tls-bcp: DH recommendations

mrex@sap.com (Martin Rex) Thu, 19 September 2013 02:47 UTC

Return-Path: <mrex@sap.com>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B16A11E8171 for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 18 Sep 2013 19:47:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.199
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.199 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.050, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_DE=0.35, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fZcSsfsyAsSK for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 18 Sep 2013 19:47:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpde02.sap-ag.de (smtpde02.sap-ag.de [155.56.68.140]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6A2E11E80E2 for <tls@ietf.org>; Wed, 18 Sep 2013 19:47:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail05.wdf.sap.corp by smtpde02.sap-ag.de (26) with ESMTP id r8J2l316009736 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Thu, 19 Sep 2013 04:47:03 +0200 (MEST)
In-Reply-To: <20130919013304.1D5EB1A983@ld9781.wdf.sap.corp>
To: mrex@sap.com
Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2013 04:47:03 +0200 (CEST)
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL125 (25)]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Message-Id: <20130919024703.3222C1A983@ld9781.wdf.sap.corp>
From: mrex@sap.com (Martin Rex)
X-SAP: out
Cc: "tls@ietf.org" <tls@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [TLS] draft-sheffer-tls-bcp: DH recommendations
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
Reply-To: mrex@sap.com
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tls>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2013 02:47:17 -0000

Martin Rex wrote:
> 
> I'm not a cryptographer, but I'm actually not convinced that
> counter modes of AES are a road I want to travel.  (I'm wondering:
> do we actually know the length of the cycles of AES in counter mode?
> Is there a paper describing what assumption the security of counter
> modes are based on, and formal proofs that AES actually has all
> these properties?)

I should have first read what counter mode actually means,
such as http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3686#section-2

I'm sorry.

-Martin