IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [TLS] Kathleen Moriarty's Yes on draft-ietf-tls-rfc4492bis-15: (with COMMENT)

Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> Tue, 14 March 2017 21:29 UTC

Return-Path: <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A113126DC2; Tue, 14 Mar 2017 14:29:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.8
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BK6HJk4Ibx9h; Tue, 14 Mar 2017 14:29:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qt0-x235.google.com (mail-qt0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c0d::235]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B8CD7129AE9; Tue, 14 Mar 2017 14:29:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qt0-x235.google.com with SMTP id i34so66295153qtc.0; Tue, 14 Mar 2017 14:29:03 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=EVFJsy/jelcERJFfUNI19q16vtyOF9zvRAr7Z+OX+7I=; b=sgbkTSLroUGgFy0tevLH1VV7JGMILsnvXKenalgX8wIZOvHDBJErcRsvNsmEl4fbVQ XS37qTijmtowKpoEv1ygB3Ix4+z3pR5ua5GpHe4m7yUyV5G0qSw7D02uHcUjEK0Qr9EE 0EuRWXHjk0CnZqlbv4+VK0Sl07rH1foJ7ooH4MCHl0TGefJ4NwIoaKV6WkJo7VkNIK/H GfPOY4dBuTP0FqadSZwWWY/+LjnlkYbRpnH0hGumwcZivzxLgXFzzph388kfHGKw9XJp l1jX8bjx1SmaFpOlyQy2cGW35McDyLAmCPrfy37DiDHT13j72pFGEAiFNKLYGhCHLcVD he3A==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=EVFJsy/jelcERJFfUNI19q16vtyOF9zvRAr7Z+OX+7I=; b=CT9z04M9fU02qrXtzFr53xf0VRGmRNisM1WkH1NKtkEBnn5ZigPj0G14ebTtHHzHOf kgQJ+wrmbI0WPHOTcgh2lpg5G4HiIOFnTZhVswwcficPjfdD/pOD78K5+RYoB1QjqxeA ScOX3jNLjeVBZ2lW7CBU2CYZJoq3jv17g3bV3TA8jZSA2fZa1qmJWsyJh2qMSTMNNgod B+Waxwdfp4Yzkvp3YxAQ4Y4onmYj0yfhKne46W1qbFxiZHFeYPFKAMvZ8ANwz2E25xqr LmLaHwtSMWwOl0V9FgeYgF0uhbPlYLjfflXiKqcH4adPk35U/vyJ7eoCRUQRQokKiQFx kmyg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AMke39ls4sGBsHnnKF+WpEtcjaoU2/mbEbMtB8KEkE2mUaj040qIJ6Yl7+IQibxsUvlDkhhqrhEsQJqsGLBc3Q==
X-Received: by 10.200.46.208 with SMTP id i16mr40530653qta.13.1489526942943; Tue, 14 Mar 2017 14:29:02 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.140.27.194 with HTTP; Tue, 14 Mar 2017 14:29:02 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <26D48307-948B-4CBE-AD4A-7C53D70BF8F0@gmail.com>
References: <148952402426.24274.4020884632180640309.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <26D48307-948B-4CBE-AD4A-7C53D70BF8F0@gmail.com>
From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2017 08:29:02 +1100
Message-ID: <CABkgnnVtDZdv1qnVARFc3Pj5dCVEqfhr0R9nUvNAvjEBbM=Eeg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Yoav Nir <ynir.ietf@gmail.com>
Cc: Kathleen Moriarty <kathleen.moriarty.ietf@gmail.com>, "tls@ietf.org" <tls@ietf.org>, tls-chairs <tls-chairs@ietf.org>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-tls-rfc4492bis@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/nZmO01THCTVteFE9hqDRlXEbXDI>
Subject: Re: [TLS] Kathleen Moriarty's Yes on draft-ietf-tls-rfc4492bis-15: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2017 21:29:08 -0000

On 15 March 2017 at 08:26, Yoav Nir <ynir.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:
> That is the document that was referenced by RFC 4492 and it’s from 1998. It
> doesn’t mention any hash function other than SHA-1.
>
> RFC 4492 said that other hash functions may be used. We’ve upgraded it to a
> SHOULD.

In light of recent developments, is there any reason we couldn't
further upgrade this advice?

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email