Re: [TLS] Comments on draft-ietf-tls-tls13-18

Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> Wed, 02 November 2016 06:04 UTC

Return-Path: <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80FBB1294C0 for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 1 Nov 2016 23:04:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4eW4yCk8LoXQ for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 1 Nov 2016 23:04:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qk0-x22d.google.com (mail-qk0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c09::22d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0EBBF1294BD for <tls@ietf.org>; Tue, 1 Nov 2016 23:04:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qk0-x22d.google.com with SMTP id o68so6619782qkf.3 for <tls@ietf.org>; Tue, 01 Nov 2016 23:04:30 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=f/UH/Klyqz5ZTC1TA15Is0/oHQi0SfEeChOYhAq4eTo=; b=IQJoWXZNN8Ngfx7ph9ao4YPMziTfP7pEZg7UY8cpv8Ah799ow/bEa5QzCl2N5qmoo2 D3buvp5ASmzWL0FRoAfwfwG2Qu47fL+TXTbYLt7tv+ANLMbD9lD2qo6nTwNi/n5QtFCc Gjh8QJqlcY0deMQ4CPibYIzgVXBY47FobJi7MnqHj14926lxK+FP2EJPR4KI+iBKYj/a DZBe9pFI9n9muk5CIV+WRG6+sAIMb9Jug/lwrgsyakICYjtfQ+cSYfJGjVy5DTbsrygt lwWUsd0qBEi+81ZLcycNb98+P0VcMTu98U6O6w/+YLFi3mRBnt6eDJu1r0T8Y1lB3sNu hpKA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=f/UH/Klyqz5ZTC1TA15Is0/oHQi0SfEeChOYhAq4eTo=; b=GJoZoaIHjqxREM8xJhH/fSydJVzbeFz0Vs/HcYxxnFwXenCFzeGcKbIrKZAUU4ljnG WL3GV78bIss3xHEfGTMAnYVhWCaUQpA2OK+9W3KjMIuHxNA3iScISCdQDJlGNEQfkp6x MLD9n7JHsTvd6+p6qEK9/L1hrXGzxuqejurxutM48Nyt8FEQvEfTQTRDY/WqWJTEgBK2 d/WR+jJfzF+G59v8FfTD36jzKNkqAhbkhSu1+ZCbVjKoMaQLiolJElwAVfAbhUfuoZAX 6svmnzOmg9DSioMD+EIXBwYu5ufhUdmy1AgEY4dhOgZVIs2YDc2EFUK3DIwP3QhLiOmJ UsNg==
X-Gm-Message-State: ABUngvf0eHcvr8BQQhPYSTmcZDrO6DJs4YX2MaYLXrXwaU9MZvhu2nxRf5O0pqvRmqQBeG45sTxs2GyVmO1WMw==
X-Received: by 10.55.158.199 with SMTP id h190mr1759431qke.202.1478066669198; Tue, 01 Nov 2016 23:04:29 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.140.85.7 with HTTP; Tue, 1 Nov 2016 23:04:28 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CACsn0c=tXjfVQ=p_rp9qv9dA=guO7GpfDtQF-WZ35tDbmc97wg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CACsn0ckbKRRy0sQ+i8bNLSqh-mqAb0UMHY13CyzmonGj8cL-qQ@mail.gmail.com> <CABcZeBOGc0rfEFB8BYwtSw6-EJ5bFav5mLCz4a2T7XXUHN5sDA@mail.gmail.com> <CACsn0c=QYM7TZwWFzifYLa0ebsGaKdAVtjJ9XapX6T6HvGiV8w@mail.gmail.com> <CABkgnnXXesHQVbsCRFFg1NQKBHcBL42tx9qanaG0uq6j=MVCEQ@mail.gmail.com> <CACsn0c=tXjfVQ=p_rp9qv9dA=guO7GpfDtQF-WZ35tDbmc97wg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2016 17:04:28 +1100
Message-ID: <CABkgnnUc5gNorYsc5Ov7SPfAdDzDJKeFWMjkrMPWoSBWfmdWCQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Watson Ladd <watsonbladd@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/naHWmIqjLHJ4o6mCEWYQdqCoJ80>
Cc: "tls@ietf.org" <tls@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [TLS] Comments on draft-ietf-tls-tls13-18
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Nov 2016 06:04:31 -0000

On 2 November 2016 at 15:57, Watson Ladd <watsonbladd@gmail.com> wrote:
> A conforming client will not produce Client Hellos that trigger
> multiple HRRs: it will listen the first time.

Good point. And most clients will elicit none.  I don't know how to
force this one into a failure to interoperate without taking the
approach Adam did with roughtime, and that's a tough call to make.