IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [TLS] Last call comments and WG Chair review of draft-ietf-tls-ecdhe-psk-aead

"Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com> Fri, 24 February 2017 14:07 UTC

Return-Path: <rsalz@akamai.com>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41ECA1297CB for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 24 Feb 2017 06:07:24 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.702
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.702 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=akamai.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id doVXD9IECmg1 for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 24 Feb 2017 06:07:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: from prod-mail-xrelay06.akamai.com (prod-mail-xrelay06.akamai.com [96.6.114.98]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91A451297AC for <tls@ietf.org>; Fri, 24 Feb 2017 06:07:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: from prod-mail-xrelay06.akamai.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by postfix.imss70 (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14F6016C788; Fri, 24 Feb 2017 14:07:21 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from prod-mail-relay09.akamai.com (prod-mail-relay09.akamai.com [172.27.22.68]) by prod-mail-xrelay06.akamai.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2FDE16BE9A; Fri, 24 Feb 2017 14:07:20 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=akamai.com; s=a1; t=1487945241; bh=6Bp6TB+qReeiBaMawGJvnKy5Qvn9clTQxI6nbYg25yE=; l=350; h=From:To:CC:Date:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=toiPNGTbaqsStMnev5ED9kVWsHySJ7xsE9puvz6V/wkAJQmxQw+S1lesKz8DWGouY WP6vGYmnT4nLnesehz0ynk+KXjz2x53FKgC25N2iuswezKOQo/rESoFRet1TraOeJj aeLRC269CNxq9zsSrSGg8Qcfd56HC54tLo2bHK3M=
Received: from email.msg.corp.akamai.com (usma1ex-cas3.msg.corp.akamai.com [172.27.123.32]) by prod-mail-relay09.akamai.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D53D61E08C; Fri, 24 Feb 2017 14:07:20 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from USMA1EX-DAG1MB1.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.123.101) by usma1ex-dag1mb2.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.123.102) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1178.4; Fri, 24 Feb 2017 09:07:20 -0500
Received: from USMA1EX-DAG1MB1.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.123.101]) by usma1ex-dag1mb1.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.123.101]) with mapi id 15.00.1178.000; Fri, 24 Feb 2017 09:07:20 -0500
From: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com>
To: Yoav Nir <ynir.ietf@gmail.com>, Joseph Salowey <joe@salowey.net>
Thread-Topic: [TLS] Last call comments and WG Chair review of draft-ietf-tls-ecdhe-psk-aead
Thread-Index: AQHSjG+AlPI2FEigPUqrjf2oARXzl6F06JEA///CuVCAAO0yAIACYtYAgAAlk4CAABSvIA==
Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2017 14:07:19 +0000
Message-ID: <91c7562e92814e3a9ebb57dfa6c59610@usma1ex-dag1mb1.msg.corp.akamai.com>
References: <CAOgPGoA0tTmwkcC3CPdgUd=6QNTpTxRT8pkXLD-Yezzh05b+KA@mail.gmail.com> <CABkgnnVTWmwyyBQrTLZ1up09vTfwKpUj_-FriEspEXD5hevshA@mail.gmail.com> <f79b14ab6eaf4ab6b18323b569337583@usma1ex-dag1mb1.msg.corp.akamai.com> <20170222171156.GA31015@LK-Perkele-V2.elisa-laajakaista.fi> <CAOgPGoDtSpwimU_EZvdRmCb_hAVJmTauS62qgPznaZJy6V7mJA@mail.gmail.com> <1CAE4CFE-2A9D-4A8D-93D4-2BA304894F96@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <1CAE4CFE-2A9D-4A8D-93D4-2BA304894F96@gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [172.19.33.176]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/nyfEnxaTz8YX9xq5TcJgAvBbutA>
Cc: "draft-ietf-tls-ecdhe-psk-aead@tools.ietf.org" <draft-ietf-tls-ecdhe-psk-aead@tools.ietf.org>, "tls@ietf.org" <tls@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [TLS] Last call comments and WG Chair review of draft-ietf-tls-ecdhe-psk-aead
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2017 14:07:24 -0000

> Assuming 256-bit AES-CCM suites are needed, I think the better place to put
> them is in the TLS 1.3 document.

That's a really big assumption. ;)

I think the burden is on folks to *prove* (yeah, I know) that additional cipher suites are needed.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email