Re: [TLS] Salsa20 and Poly1305 in TLS
Geoffrey Keating <geoffk@geoffk.org> Tue, 30 July 2013 18:26 UTC
Return-Path: <geoffk@geoffk.org>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C65421E8063 for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 30 Jul 2013 11:26:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8EmlIFU1pZYW for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 30 Jul 2013 11:26:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dragaera.releasedominatrix.com (dragaera.releasedominatrix.com [216.129.118.138]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 671DA11E80F2 for <tls@ietf.org>; Tue, 30 Jul 2013 11:26:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by dragaera.releasedominatrix.com (Postfix, from userid 501) id C4A5F33D249; Tue, 30 Jul 2013 18:26:16 +0000 (UTC)
Sender: geoffk@localhost.localdomain
To: Ben Laurie <benl@google.com>
References: <CAL9PXLySuS1gn8YisobYrbEnNpxJuYPbKB0qtkCOMnb+m90Jjg@mail.gmail.com> <CABrd9SRUNaWS-DDPy4+dVJUuaTfAnCo2SKhrMc8PPOKqiqf9tQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Geoffrey Keating <geoffk@geoffk.org>
Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2013 11:26:16 -0700
In-Reply-To: <CABrd9SRUNaWS-DDPy4+dVJUuaTfAnCo2SKhrMc8PPOKqiqf9tQ@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <m24nbbrjjr.fsf@localhost.localdomain>
Lines: 8
User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.4
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Cc: "tls@ietf.org" <tls@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [TLS] Salsa20 and Poly1305 in TLS
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tls>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2013 18:26:27 -0000
Ben Laurie <benl@google.com> writes: > Also, defining ciphersuites for SSL 3, TLS 1.0/1.1 would be good, so we can > use them despite downgrade attacks. Surely if you discover that the remote end appears to support only SSL 3 but yet somehow supports Salsa, you should stop trying to communicate because you're under a downgrade attack?
- Re: [TLS] Salsa20 and Poly1305 in TLS Rene Struik
- Re: [TLS] Salsa20 and Poly1305 in TLS Nick Mathewson
- Re: [TLS] Salsa20 and Poly1305 in TLS Ted Krovetz
- [TLS] Salsa20 and Poly1305 in TLS Adam Langley
- Re: [TLS] Salsa20 and Poly1305 in TLS Nico Williams
- Re: [TLS] Salsa20 and Poly1305 in TLS Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos
- Re: [TLS] Salsa20 and Poly1305 in TLS Ben Laurie
- Re: [TLS] Salsa20 and Poly1305 in TLS Adam Langley
- Re: [TLS] Salsa20 and Poly1305 in TLS Adam Langley
- Re: [TLS] Salsa20 and Poly1305 in TLS Geoffrey Keating
- Re: [TLS] Salsa20 and Poly1305 in TLS Adam Langley
- Re: [TLS] Salsa20 and Poly1305 in TLS Adam Langley
- Re: [TLS] Salsa20 and Poly1305 in TLS Adam Langley
- Re: [TLS] Salsa20 and Poly1305 in TLS Ben Laurie
- Re: [TLS] Salsa20 and Poly1305 in TLS Adam Langley
- Re: [TLS] Salsa20 and Poly1305 in TLS Ted Krovetz
- Re: [TLS] Salsa20 and Poly1305 in TLS Simon Josefsson
- Re: [TLS] Salsa20 and Poly1305 in TLS Blumenthal, Uri - 0558 - MITLL
- Re: [TLS] Salsa20 and Poly1305 in TLS Ted Krovetz