IETF Logo Mail Archive

[TLS] Re: Is there any interest in an RFC on how to do cross-organization mTLS?

"Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com> Mon, 09 September 2024 20:29 UTC

Return-Path: <rsalz@akamai.com>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B350C14F5E8 for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Sep 2024 13:29:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.252
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.252 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.148, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=akamai.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4O-uzxKUfF2o for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Sep 2024 13:29:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx0b-00190b01.pphosted.com (mx0b-00190b01.pphosted.com [IPv6:2620:100:9005:57f::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56A75C14EB17 for <tls@ietf.org>; Mon, 9 Sep 2024 13:29:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pps.filterd (m0122330.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-00190b01.pphosted.com (8.18.1.2/8.18.1.2) with ESMTP id 489HXa7w002779; Mon, 9 Sep 2024 21:29:15 +0100
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=akamai.com; h= content-type:date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :references:subject:to; s=jan2016.eng; bh=yePioArc4MgaxliysYIc8N KvJfSNezIwHRn+Zu1rxAw=; b=jTCMoROg+bDxe46WEPJsY4SiJrfm64Cx2XvQhp StQvel1VNephzW8ble3cMnJ9P9RoK+w2anukdgan9G39wfhGibWg+08IDPS27ro9 8lcFQzfTbVfqibO/sQySxcxM/DFhSsB4v62mYKC2qf55SlBhklvh3/KgZ3bKsANS cLglwcSp7qh7DX83ZSuIRjc919BSdYYSdz7GFK8JfIUvlcRZe6x2NEXuy0dpzkCa IrGe16gZ4EXB+2TVJM11sfxqfjGra2D/Y+AyGLtePwRCBZZn8iFEWcfp0q7MGIxp iPX66ms/deHyw3LJqkRXoEy7qZYzUFDh0i+Q4gQDeoFDWv1w==
Received: from prod-mail-ppoint3 (a72-247-45-31.deploy.static.akamaitechnologies.com [72.247.45.31] (may be forged)) by mx0b-00190b01.pphosted.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 41gy9v4c54-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 09 Sep 2024 21:29:15 +0100 (BST)
Received: from pps.filterd (prod-mail-ppoint3.akamai.com [127.0.0.1]) by prod-mail-ppoint3.akamai.com (8.18.1.2/8.18.1.2) with ESMTP id 489HXpxx019030; Mon, 9 Sep 2024 16:29:14 -0400
Received: from email.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.50.206]) by prod-mail-ppoint3.akamai.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 41h3qyqh3v-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 09 Sep 2024 16:29:14 -0400
Received: from ustx2ex-dag4mb4.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.50.203) by ustx2ex-dag4mb7.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.50.206) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.2.1544.11; Mon, 9 Sep 2024 13:29:13 -0700
Received: from ustx2ex-dag4mb4.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.50.203]) by ustx2ex-dag4mb4.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.50.203]) with mapi id 15.02.1544.011; Mon, 9 Sep 2024 13:29:13 -0700
From: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com>
To: Mark Robinson <mark@markrobinson.io>, "tls@ietf.org" <tls@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [TLS] Is there any interest in an RFC on how to do cross-organization mTLS?
Thread-Index: AQHbAuhAs7Eb9AYPR0a4aYegUHddwrJQGleA
Date: Mon, 09 Sep 2024 20:29:13 +0000
Message-ID: <02100E15-44A3-41FF-B81C-B81FCC94AAE7@akamai.com>
References: <CAHaGKyeSBGD4AAbnddiWtG7kEvh3Y6mbTyAgw485UfJZhFKXkw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAHaGKyeSBGD4AAbnddiWtG7kEvh3Y6mbTyAgw485UfJZhFKXkw@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/16.88.24082514
x-originating-ip: [172.27.164.43]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_02100E1544A341FFB81CB81FCC94AAE7akamaicom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=baseguard engine=ICAP:2.0.293,Aquarius:18.0.1039,Hydra:6.0.680,FMLib:17.12.60.29 definitions=2024-09-09_10,2024-09-09_02,2024-09-02_01
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 suspectscore=0 mlxlogscore=691 bulkscore=0 adultscore=0 mlxscore=0 phishscore=0 spamscore=0 malwarescore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2408220000 definitions=main-2409090160
X-Proofpoint-GUID: uBP4I01mJL5wsz9-UkoKPR9y5J26vOmt
X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: uBP4I01mJL5wsz9-UkoKPR9y5J26vOmt
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=baseguard engine=ICAP:2.0.293,Aquarius:18.0.1039,Hydra:6.0.680,FMLib:17.12.60.29 definitions=2024-09-06_09,2024-09-06_01,2024-09-02_01
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 suspectscore=0 adultscore=0 mlxlogscore=508 lowpriorityscore=0 spamscore=0 impostorscore=0 priorityscore=1501 phishscore=0 clxscore=1011 bulkscore=0 malwarescore=0 mlxscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.19.0-2408220000 definitions=main-2409090161
Message-ID-Hash: DBXDU5Q7ZRKSMMV4JSNLRIPVIRSUJ3G6
X-Message-ID-Hash: DBXDU5Q7ZRKSMMV4JSNLRIPVIRSUJ3G6
X-MailFrom: rsalz@akamai.com
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-tls.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc4
Precedence: list
Subject: [TLS] Re: Is there any interest in an RFC on how to do cross-organization mTLS?
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/oV9hkU-SODAxRenUWMsu8ytoVX8>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:tls-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:tls-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:tls-leave@ietf.org>

Would it be appropriate to write an RFC on how to make cross-organization mTLS work reliably and at scale? Would this group/mailing list be the right people to work with to make that happen?

You should also ask the UTA working group if they are interested.

v2.27.8 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status