[TLS] Standards Track for draft-ietf-tls-ticketrequests

Sean Turner <sean@sn3rd.com> Fri, 25 October 2019 13:04 UTC

Return-Path: <sean@sn3rd.com>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8761E120874 for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 25 Oct 2019 06:04:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=sn3rd.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NWHH93ItXE3N for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 25 Oct 2019 06:04:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qk1-x735.google.com (mail-qk1-x735.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::735]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0C67E12086F for <tls@ietf.org>; Fri, 25 Oct 2019 06:04:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qk1-x735.google.com with SMTP id a194so1629306qkg.10 for <tls@ietf.org>; Fri, 25 Oct 2019 06:04:23 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sn3rd.com; s=google; h=from:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:subject:message-id:date :to; bh=X5pGyNEmEIhAAENcADJUpYsGrhn+8+1h2GAjl914SNo=; b=Xf76jzcqwk4kvR7IH8r3GTRNsbYpT9OZ9peO9ivXojEKborC5J40D2VnzOh88cxKXw gPeIKI/+lWQUwU+Z9rTuTvzcJ9PbG9LM5EzOQp9OgI55d2lc+HxlmVOB+xUrrqStklF9 p8NeS45ju2cDrNTfXnzL35DNA+IIuV3BxDnp4=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :subject:message-id:date:to; bh=X5pGyNEmEIhAAENcADJUpYsGrhn+8+1h2GAjl914SNo=; b=i/Tdhx0jfIDwcB0kkfb7DsN9VPNcFDEMXq4Ha7u3RX8rnOZXyrRc8Zj8HfoSSfS7Wz HprdTVLPahHT0noeL0v3ZSfdipzJ7b9rrT5qX33jtgVg+9OEmK2oOrtJ/++BsQ2+Y6Df VAqhv8xm4NpgVwh+X0q1Js0JJc9ZrMQ/xXfgi5uT1cMKSkvFjoitMe8mljwdZtVR7ibI sEfSdIeDCgYVnXTRBWW9NsLevAWSp4jcPbXnGw8k3lyXTHLyqesoQS9madEnkR7RSZ4v //sEEGFlAX2YbT0ZNrC/OWo7j/E97ZnPLt3HXZFra9bjdyfZZ1PNrZMifEK9A/rmVHXG Mqzw==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUWBTf6Y00NXiS2IB9bsotUwVkhVkALQ+E2jB2dDoHE2M4jKRtk 3+Q/mvKQgBbW400DU2YEWLkcTD4FFM8=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwqOSZq7YTrrJ9mHVTHivEAMKLvEGlrzmpaEo7/mIGVbPzHrr9Jc46GkMUXxfAzpX1l8cdp6w==
X-Received: by 2002:a37:82c1:: with SMTP id e184mr2717682qkd.424.1572008662935; Fri, 25 Oct 2019 06:04:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sn3rd.lan ([75.102.131.36]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id l93sm1148475qtd.86.2019.10.25.06.04.22 for <tls@ietf.org> (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 25 Oct 2019 06:04:22 -0700 (PDT)
From: Sean Turner <sean@sn3rd.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.11\))
Message-Id: <586FB0E1-5C8C-474D-952D-A99449F1E54E@sn3rd.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2019 09:04:21 -0400
To: TLS List <tls@ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.11)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/oeOKuH2-BCIlskOYTvS-LSKgkYo>
Subject: [TLS] Standards Track for draft-ietf-tls-ticketrequests
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2019 13:04:26 -0000

During my Shepherd review of draft-ietf-tls-ticketrequests, I noticed that the intended status of the draft is Informational, but the IANA Considerations sections indicates that the Recommended column is “Y”.  RFC 8447 requires Standards Action for an extension to be marked as Recommended.  I went back and looked and the extension has been marked as Recommended since Chris' and David’s initial individual draft back in April 2018.  I think that this has been an oversight and believe the intended status should be changed to Proposed Standard.  If you think this change is wrong, please let the list know why by November 1st.

Note that this is the final issue before I will issue WGLC.

Cheers,

spt