Re: [TLS] [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-ietf-tls-oldversions-deprecate-09.txt> (Deprecating TLSv1.0 and TLSv1.1) to Best Current Practice

Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie> Tue, 10 November 2020 11:33 UTC

Return-Path: <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 456783A0846; Tue, 10 Nov 2020 03:33:31 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cs.tcd.ie
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IfsozN8B9SJh; Tue, 10 Nov 2020 03:33:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mercury.scss.tcd.ie (mercury.scss.tcd.ie [134.226.56.6]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 861563A082F; Tue, 10 Nov 2020 03:33:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mercury.scss.tcd.ie (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81145BE5C; Tue, 10 Nov 2020 11:33:26 +0000 (GMT)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at scss.tcd.ie
Received: from mercury.scss.tcd.ie ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mercury.scss.tcd.ie [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hC_Wu6iO4qZd; Tue, 10 Nov 2020 11:33:25 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from [10.244.2.119] (95-45-153-252-dynamic.agg2.phb.bdt-fng.eircom.net [95.45.153.252]) by mercury.scss.tcd.ie (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D48C0BE51; Tue, 10 Nov 2020 11:33:24 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cs.tcd.ie; s=mail; t=1605008005; bh=M824fFW/ceVj/EgvZO7YUGfavIuyfwozjfFqSjpF0f0=; h=Subject:To:Cc:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=fAW5KPa4rF7gMVfIYpAcDDMvG0Ykw4+bH6pDTj5FlyTka6/R4auJ8hpgffEmH+521 Pr0W/21j6A17aNc5gAYOdw/xyFFz5Z0kCNH4LqYPgMw2osFT+p1D26xbd/cQc75Mfz VFlmAUD9cxN4iqOi3v8DFrPjnRlQeH3kw7GYP1yg=
To: tom petch <daedulus@btconnect.com>, last-call@ietf.org
Cc: draft-ietf-tls-oldversions-deprecate@ietf.org, Kathleen Moriarty <kathleen.moriarty.ietf@gmail.com>, tls-chairs@ietf.org, tls@ietf.org
References: <160496076356.8063.5138064792555453422@ietfa.amsl.com> <5FAA69AB.4090802@btconnect.com> <754d1831-e44f-0299-dcd1-24a311e8c442@cs.tcd.ie> <5FAA79E6.4060401@btconnect.com>
From: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
Message-ID: <57dec4d8-0824-291c-9c13-15627693eb2a@cs.tcd.ie>
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2020 11:33:23 +0000
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.3.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <5FAA79E6.4060401@btconnect.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="ChlHcT3U5C6x1na2ERPg9v5lNn0YlEyrI"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/orauI4JGnJgpoIb7tsqI6Wpel2I>
Subject: Re: [TLS] [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-ietf-tls-oldversions-deprecate-09.txt> (Deprecating TLSv1.0 and TLSv1.1) to Best Current Practice
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2020 11:33:32 -0000


On 10/11/2020 11:30, tom petch wrote:
> Perhaps a second look at the algorithm 
> to work out why these got missed to get a fix on how many more there may be. 
> 

Sure, that's reasonable. (Mightn't be today.)

Cheers,
S.