Re: [TLS] Resolution on gmt_time

Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com> Wed, 16 July 2014 15:10 UTC

Return-Path: <ekr@rtfm.com>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4875D1B2B85 for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 16 Jul 2014 08:10:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.977
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.977 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id T0j7kZU2tU3C for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 16 Jul 2014 08:10:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wi0-f173.google.com (mail-wi0-f173.google.com [209.85.212.173]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BEFCE1B2B82 for <tls@ietf.org>; Wed, 16 Jul 2014 08:10:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wi0-f173.google.com with SMTP id f8so5490361wiw.12 for <tls@ietf.org>; Wed, 16 Jul 2014 08:10:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=BodlkJsFwJTXtZM4LUY2D+Ne1GGJcGpN4eaq/ttJwz0=; b=NKgLy1/1SuQpZzEOz8ShT9I5HulGQsF53QkQ+WczVAxyEyS0ZkilMEMZTC4psPTN6d ZwYcNpiniTN+UvBV4P6nybKBNKJGZe/oEHTT6XzVis1i40Np2dIZa8ArVCdM+nsUnKVm 5k1dXNfS9t4dj5dW6oRmkf3uvoYLr8MwFoZ7Ewur/XthDJt1Rfpk5Mnx1rQ3Yq3ezvRe 7LoGJWxUPpG0M+rx2/vXf+fchLhi0ME0G+/67c3l8QV+4SAhBuWhJYCj+L+Qk8mNZG0J +YvZHbntd15+NME+dU/8aKenmxF2CRioK9sW4w/4gRBEcLmivjVbYRj9KQ5Ps4cU7ova EpEQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkP8LHBR2LMBWcMRfdrQvX9QiJIzza5bbcflw/b7WipV/67cR3TVUknj4Kzi1G6qxs3YGLR
X-Received: by 10.180.89.143 with SMTP id bo15mr14219696wib.78.1405523409659; Wed, 16 Jul 2014 08:10:09 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.217.128.12 with HTTP; Wed, 16 Jul 2014 08:09:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Originating-IP: [166.137.177.49]
In-Reply-To: <338B3B88-CCE5-4D79-97DC-1EC7D84891AA@cisco.com>
References: <338B3B88-CCE5-4D79-97DC-1EC7D84891AA@cisco.com>
From: Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2014 08:09:29 -0700
Message-ID: <CABcZeBP7hTxL59+0GmRH1PYGr8g3+=cdXE3dsHmmGHDnJcOz3A@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Joseph Salowey (jsalowey)" <jsalowey@cisco.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=e89a8f3bab878e810d04fe50eb47
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/p-57PHW6SEigtr-qfTr8Eav5avo
Cc: "<tls@ietf.org>" <tls@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [TLS] Resolution on gmt_time
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2014 15:10:15 -0000

See https://github.com/tlswg/tls13-spec/pull/65

Expected merge date: Friday Jul 18


On Sun, Jun 22, 2014 at 10:17 PM, Joseph Salowey (jsalowey) <
jsalowey@cisco.com> wrote:

> Thanks all. Based on the list discussion, the chairs believe there
> is rough consensus on the following points:
>
> For TLS 1.3:
> - Remove GMT time from the ClientHello entirely.
> - Remove GMT time from the ServerHello at the MUST or SHOULD level.
>
> For TLS 1.2:
> - Remove GMT time from the ClientHello entirely.
> - Remove GMT time from the ServerHello at the SHOULD level.
>
> Next steps for TLS 1.3 are as follows:
> The editor is directed to remove GMT time from both random values
> and open an issue as to whether or not the ServerHello can have
> a time value in it.
>
> Next steps for TLS 1.2 are as follows:
> Absent any objections, the chairs intend to adopt draft-matthewson
> as a WG draft. Anyone who objects to this, please say something by
> Friday June 27.
>
> Joe
> (For the chairs)
>
> _______________________________________________
> TLS mailing list
> TLS@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
>