IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [TLS] WGLC for draft-ietf-tls-ticketrequests

Daniel Migault <daniel.migault@ericsson.com> Sat, 01 February 2020 02:20 UTC

Return-Path: <mglt.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50A651200A1 for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 31 Jan 2020 18:20:02 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.4
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.4 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.249, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xfrIe51kKtgP for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 31 Jan 2020 18:20:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ua1-f54.google.com (mail-ua1-f54.google.com [209.85.222.54]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9B355120024 for <tls@ietf.org>; Fri, 31 Jan 2020 18:20:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ua1-f54.google.com with SMTP id 1so3341073uao.1 for <tls@ietf.org>; Fri, 31 Jan 2020 18:20:00 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=gryNIaOLIvoSdlOV1DleuWdc0XC8dGc9q1rRzbRvAQ8=; b=DH0n+q4gOCtpKA27K31AVTv3HJ4mDp1cDUlu9hx+k0ldvP+5/Q7lkyrrPTJmk7RDPx BrqcQMAJPFCGsPmZEa+NceScJDrfK8bl/440F0HbXo5HJCejGafkQd/GmjwiggIyJ+LB MfFk3fxo8X4Hn8dYJ3nmwu73BlJ2Jw81vz4JHV9cG/QoIhBORSWgs6QdP/T872hMImjR yZEqpRLqJBy7CCSMwCyiJEts0dqn6r2RaoTR7g4F1DHcdhLEOsmN8Y8y5x2ew4noCM3g +xHaKCKaKESBuQsAcgPoZOnm/OqU+h/SA255STExuGxdTL1ObaQr6j7eSpHyHyuurcYT GAFQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUJOmDjBc4Q/wfhEUrvt6RyQnDKTG5DKOeYuMZdzal2/Ut8zPtk wAZIBBJEn1O7Z3GXfDTQ7UE3Kl6A8vtxpIaVzIoMLttp
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxyA5AeBf/oSO7ciy70N14OJy/Ank4HKM5BNmOXvayGKszVbm7qB8pTHB1bMlzGnLbAZMJ0zlpDWFoMVgFDC3A=
X-Received: by 2002:ab0:6881:: with SMTP id t1mr7986514uar.88.1580523599723; Fri, 31 Jan 2020 18:19:59 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAN2QdAH7t4fPgBfBSO7Ni1As2bVB9QvCw1s9j0ggqvTRUATE8A@mail.gmail.com> <20200123021455.GA73491@straasha.imrryr.org> <87427017-551e-4633-a0d3-75f378879aa9@redhat.com> <20200123124055.GF73491@straasha.imrryr.org> <CACsn0cngxBQTB+Pfw6t_+qsSFb0Kf8mV1U1J1UTsPJiUk=vg0w@mail.gmail.com> <20200123193250.GD12073@localhost> <20200123210151.GG73491@straasha.imrryr.org> <5F5F670C-A0BD-4F38-BEFF-192C171EDAC1@apple.com> <20200131235533.GA18021@localhost> <CAChr6Sz6PEgQUQg8dB9Ym0z5_iRjmZE5g1hUCCgEOsA-7A=P-w@mail.gmail.com> <20200201011115.GB18021@localhost> <CAChr6SywucrTUsAeN6Aw26ufmhcB8txAmFVNGnUaeR3gG653VQ@mail.gmail.com> <4E7DC6E9-A04E-4016-A12A-CFC723E18219@dukhovni.org> <5E66E815-E649-4EE5-9780-AA2158F81744@apple.com> <9e4ada20-680e-6fa7-f8bb-e94c26440d82@cs.tcd.ie>
In-Reply-To: <9e4ada20-680e-6fa7-f8bb-e94c26440d82@cs.tcd.ie>
From: Daniel Migault <daniel.migault@ericsson.com>
Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2020 21:19:48 -0500
Message-ID: <CADZyTkn-=N2_M4z4TYZTbfK11Fv-GeBSJ=btbrFNytO94qcJpg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
Cc: IETF TLS WG <tls@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000b8824c059d7a53d1"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/pG8HRpuTeCc8O_DfLIw6BAG03YI>
Subject: Re: [TLS] WGLC for draft-ietf-tls-ticketrequests
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 01 Feb 2020 02:20:02 -0000

On Fri, Jan 31, 2020 at 9:14 PM Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
wrote:

>
> Hiya,
>
> I have no particular position about this draft but
> am curious about 2 things:
>
> #1 I don't get why it's not possible for postfix to
> determine the best way to manage tickets based on the
> destination port to which the ClientHello is sent. I
> totally get why that won't solve 100% of cases, but it
> would surely solve a huge percentage? Apologies if an
> answer was already posted as part of this v. long
> thread.
>
> #2 I don't get why Viktor's request for special handling
> for value 255 is a real problem for anyone. We have
> another thread today envisaging 2040 extensions flags,
> so I really have a hard time seeing what here justifies
> rejecting Viktor's argument. FWIW, this thread has not
> provided me with an obvious answer to #2 other than "not-
> invented-here." I'm not sure that declaring things in the
> rough where the only identifiable issue is NIH is the
> overall best outcome, longer term.
>

+ 1 I have not seen any technical answer either for not considering this
mechanism.

>
> Cheers,
> S.
>
> _______________________________________________
> TLS mailing list
> TLS@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email