[TLS] Still missing: TLS_ECDH_anon_WITH_AES_xxx_GCM_SHAxxx
Nico Williams <nico@cryptonector.com> Tue, 11 March 2014 22:49 UTC
Return-Path: <nico@cryptonector.com>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1596E1A085E for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 11 Mar 2014 15:49:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.944
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.944 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, FROM_12LTRDOM=0.1, IP_NOT_FRIENDLY=0.334] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bwlHvHh4pAJm for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 11 Mar 2014 15:49:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from homiemail-a105.g.dreamhost.com (agjbgdcfdbec.dreamhost.com [69.163.253.142]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7EFC1A081E for <tls@ietf.org>; Tue, 11 Mar 2014 15:49:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from homiemail-a105.g.dreamhost.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by homiemail-a105.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44BF42005D907 for <tls@ietf.org>; Tue, 11 Mar 2014 15:49:02 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=cryptonector.com; h= mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; s= cryptonector.com; bh=NTZ/uydIbMCwMteOaGCHTmv+jNY=; b=xW8DRDdzCf3 LkrOxBU6Acu+az/ZRrZRnHWgakMPOubPyqnGONpBtoJYduimqCE6Jpgurb9qqis5 mYpCAzNw7WlNr5+tmelegJ10lyRB7CFi4Rns0zhfQwYRjJ0/EjwesGaMCBF0x4yo fm1/Ed1EMIIrxvRPgkRFhy5SGzmHrxkU=
Received: from mail-we0-f172.google.com (mail-we0-f172.google.com [74.125.82.172]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: nico@cryptonector.com) by homiemail-a105.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id ED0022005D902 for <tls@ietf.org>; Tue, 11 Mar 2014 15:49:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-we0-f172.google.com with SMTP id t61so10731618wes.3 for <tls@ietf.org>; Tue, 11 Mar 2014 15:49:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=aLFWM46dRs6vR4Z9lfojgxqGyy1s1CBer88xX9ZpKrg=; b=aZmJfWOrTs/TYrIN0PzkGCokAUnOrviTa7d8rM5LgHYIsX2+LlQETnp7a87ffTB4eo sWynuIEOqDPHZxr7z0GxtrudKKlMplanl79jh+u8ZUCmN8Xuy2dai9mlr5oQhoC/EJpy bqfJpBUXGpgkfdLxhmAtbfylgB6i+xDDCryj07Xame1dQOwYV+SWTyULgL9kzKHthIpe ZS4q9PJxMbVC8/8LlBHDZtqTbEuJ7y9WUfRasORXLwcKTYoGOvQfKY7kxKDtJd89Crai 9nBCu0TL/o+YBYWn4VBus1RSMVX7B4diWShl0TROwrAyonLuIjbwFyCsq9yHHZ1ea196 d4zQ==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.180.77.74 with SMTP id q10mr4954167wiw.39.1394578140849; Tue, 11 Mar 2014 15:49:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.216.199.6 with HTTP; Tue, 11 Mar 2014 15:49:00 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2014 17:49:00 -0500
Message-ID: <CAK3OfOgw70LVQsykxNZSH9+4Dn2inBTx0q0KrvujS1LOY1i9tg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Nico Williams <nico@cryptonector.com>
To: "tls@ietf.org" <tls@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/pHhe7gFfItsUijmwholOdAy9bjk
Subject: [TLS] Still missing: TLS_ECDH_anon_WITH_AES_xxx_GCM_SHAxxx
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2014 22:49:09 -0000
This is a big problem for anything that wants to do opportunistic TLS (e.g., MTAs, like Postfix). Shall I submit an I-D? With what handle? draft-williams-... or draft-tls-...? Nico --
- [TLS] Still missing: TLS_ECDH_anon_WITH_AES_xxx_G… Nico Williams
- Re: [TLS] Still missing: TLS_ECDH_anon_WITH_AES_x… Manuel Pégourié-Gonnard
- Re: [TLS] Still missing: TLS_ECDH_anon_WITH_AES_x… Daniel Kahn Gillmor
- Re: [TLS] Still missing: TLS_ECDH_anon_WITH_AES_x… Alyssa Rowan
- Re: [TLS] Still missing: TLS_ECDH_anon_WITH_AES_x… Alexandre Anzala-Yamajako
- Re: [TLS] Still missing: TLS_ECDH_anon_WITH_AES_x… Yoav Nir
- Re: [TLS] Still missing: TLS_ECDH_anon_WITH_AES_x… Peter Gutmann
- Re: [TLS] Still missing: TLS_ECDH_anon_WITH_AES_x… Nico Williams
- Re: [TLS] Still missing: TLS_ECDH_anon_WITH_AES_x… Alyssa Rowan
- Re: [TLS] Still missing: TLS_ECDH_anon_WITH_AES_x… Yaron Sheffer
- Re: [TLS] Still missing: TLS_ECDH_anon_WITH_AES_x… Nico Williams
- Re: [TLS] Still missing: TLS_ECDH_anon_WITH_AES_x… Martin Rex
- Re: [TLS] Still missing: TLS_ECDH_anon_WITH_AES_x… Yaron Sheffer
- Re: [TLS] Still missing: TLS_ECDH_anon_WITH_AES_x… Nico Williams
- Re: [TLS] Still missing: TLS_ECDH_anon_WITH_AES_x… Nico Williams
- Re: [TLS] Still missing: TLS_ECDH_anon_WITH_AES_x… Kurt Roeckx
- Re: [TLS] Still missing: TLS_ECDH_anon_WITH_AES_x… Peter Gutmann