Re: [TLS] Last Call: <draft-ietf-tls-applayerprotoneg-03.txt> (Transport Layer Security (TLS) Application Layer Protocol Negotiation Extension) to Proposed Standard

"Randy Presuhn" <randy_presuhn@mindspring.com> Mon, 16 December 2013 00:03 UTC

Return-Path: <randy_presuhn@mindspring.com>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F33121AE224; Sun, 15 Dec 2013 16:03:06 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 19mjTtw3ZUnn; Sun, 15 Dec 2013 16:03:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: from elasmtp-banded.atl.sa.earthlink.net (elasmtp-banded.atl.sa.earthlink.net [209.86.89.70]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10F141AE20B; Sun, 15 Dec 2013 16:03:03 -0800 (PST)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=dk20050327; d=mindspring.com; b=Hyx125S3hjNCmv+fk3PkmacYv55hMwpT1Y8YY8MPG2WrV+6RJzw1YgS3rLmNp3N6; h=Received:Message-ID:From:To:References:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Priority:X-MSMail-Priority:X-Mailer:X-MimeOLE:X-ELNK-Trace:X-Originating-IP;
Received: from [76.254.54.154] (helo=oemcomputer) by elasmtp-banded.atl.sa.earthlink.net with esmtpa (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from <randy_presuhn@mindspring.com>) id 1VsLeI-000553-Vq; Sun, 15 Dec 2013 19:03:03 -0500
Message-ID: <006a01cef9f2$6e59bde0$6b01a8c0@oemcomputer>
From: "Randy Presuhn" <randy_presuhn@mindspring.com>
To: <ietf@ietf.org>, <tls@ietf.org>, <iesg@ietf.org>
References: <20131213171608.10285.15352.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <9D6C4F2B-25ED-4A2A-AE89-03122D7213B8@vpnc.org> <52AB6323.2050107@akr.io> <FB25564E-DD77-45B1-B9B7-605C6F581E70@checkpoint.com> <52ABAB5E.4040506@akr.io>
Date: Sun, 15 Dec 2013 16:04:45 -0800
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1478
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1478
X-ELNK-Trace: 4488c18417c9426da92b9037bc8bcf44d4c20f6b8d69d8889e105617274a0edb95d58d56dff202c4c06c0644a1c6d2c7350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c
X-Originating-IP: 76.254.54.154
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sun, 15 Dec 2013 16:07:15 -0800
Subject: Re: [TLS] Last Call: <draft-ietf-tls-applayerprotoneg-03.txt> (Transport Layer Security (TLS) Application Layer Protocol Negotiation Extension) to Proposed Standard
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2013 00:03:07 -0000

Hi -

> From: "Alyssa Rowan" <akr@akr.io>;
> To: <ietf@ietf.org>;; <tls@ietf.org>;; <iesg@ietf.org>;
> Sent: Friday, December 13, 2013 4:50 PM
> Subject: Re: [TLS] Last Call: <draft-ietf-tls-applayerprotoneg-03.txt> (Transport Layer Security (TLS) Application Layer Protocol
Negotiation Extension) to Proposed Standard
...
> If HTTP/(1|2) is all it's really intended to be used for at this time,
> (your and Martin's response makes me think maybe it is), then perhaps
> we SHOULD only use it for that at this time.
>
> I think that would substantially weaken my objection. How would others
> feel about that?

I think at least a little consideration should be given to other
protocols that employ TLS, e.g. Netconf.

Randy