IETF Logo Mail Archive

[TLS] Re: Changing WG Mail List Reputation

Bob Beck <beck@obtuse.com> Tue, 14 January 2025 19:50 UTC

Return-Path: <beck@obtuse.com>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44A28C270038 for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 14 Jan 2025 11:50:50 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.83
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.83 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HELO_DYNAMIC_IPADDR=1.951, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, RDNS_DYNAMIC=0.982, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=obtuse.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jzzciQe_y11y for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 14 Jan 2025 11:50:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: from h198-166-139-10.ptr.cidc.telus.com (h198-166-139-10.ptr.cidc.telus.com [198.166.139.10]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 895E0C232629 for <tls@ietf.org>; Tue, 14 Jan 2025 11:49:37 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=obtuse.com; s=20200401; t=1736884174; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=uTgOlI/qo/FAnVWOPzkpHnGoRhLjdS7nM6GmudbrUoo=; b=rvjTQ7nBfwccnFTdot8rBvObgb2jWDzk0TQV7dvrJZx2LPpUSmOEsGfP+AYaJMjHJI2Cs7 2WaFd+VTVPZY3DEbHw7h7mQTwzWyO+/ITUUJsXgR2u3M/fMVCrgG3YkcqQddSwq8qRko83 ayEauYZfq5hRUfC+Fv/drigbAnAFj5g=
Received: from smtpclient.apple (<unknown> [192.168.20.3]) by mail.obtuse.com (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id cdfba7f1 (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256:NO); Tue, 14 Jan 2025 12:49:34 -0700 (MST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3776.700.51.11.1\))
From: Bob Beck <beck@obtuse.com>
In-Reply-To: <MW4PR09MB10059F5B79AC6A1B170397D6EF3182@MW4PR09MB10059.namprd09.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2025 12:49:24 -0700
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <B68EBF64-D37D-4C8F-92F8-D8E88EDA735D@obtuse.com>
References: <FDD895DA-2BEF-4475-9AE5-15EB5E7E1AE3@sn3rd.com> <fcee0cc0-07d1-47c9-9b1e-172b69aafe37@app.fastmail.com> <MW4PR09MB10059F5B79AC6A1B170397D6EF3182@MW4PR09MB10059.namprd09.prod.outlook.com>
To: "tls@ietf.org" <tls@ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3776.700.51.11.1)
Message-ID-Hash: VUU3Z3PRE5PMZGFSJMVQUCDKFRPCZWYT
X-Message-ID-Hash: VUU3Z3PRE5PMZGFSJMVQUCDKFRPCZWYT
X-MailFrom: beck@obtuse.com
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-tls.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: Bob Beck <beck@obtuse.com>
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc6
Precedence: list
Subject: [TLS] Re: Changing WG Mail List Reputation
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/prKJb3zaMiBeqvTYx4EmKPpN79Q>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:tls-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:tls-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:tls-leave@ietf.org>


> On Jan 14, 2025, at 12:20 PM, Dang, Quynh H. (Fed) <quynh.dang=40nist.gov@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
> 
>  Maybe consensus calls can only be made and completed at the in-person meetings ?

The problem with in-person (or even virtual at the in-person meetings) is it then becomes even more of a pay-to-play proposition to participate.

Not all valuable participants have an organization funding their participation at IETF. I believe we still want to encourage such participation, not discourage it.

v2.29.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status