Return-Path: X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 395E2129595 for ; Tue, 18 Oct 2016 09:31:17 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.331 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.331 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.431] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0TauZOeDJ1cq for ; Tue, 18 Oct 2016 09:31:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from welho-filter2.welho.com (welho-filter2.welho.com [83.102.41.24]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9021C12945E for ; Tue, 18 Oct 2016 09:31:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by welho-filter2.welho.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E64613FBE; Tue, 18 Oct 2016 19:31:13 +0300 (EEST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at pp.htv.fi Received: from welho-smtp1.welho.com ([IPv6:::ffff:83.102.41.84]) by localhost (welho-filter2.welho.com [::ffff:83.102.41.24]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wSgyW2IBf_Gv; Tue, 18 Oct 2016 19:31:12 +0300 (EEST) Received: from LK-Perkele-V2 (87-100-237-87.bb.dnainternet.fi [87.100.237.87]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by welho-smtp1.welho.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C08D0C4; Tue, 18 Oct 2016 19:31:12 +0300 (EEST) Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2016 19:31:05 +0300 From: Ilari Liusvaara To: Xiaoyin Liu Message-ID: <20161018163104.GA2405@LK-Perkele-V2.elisa-laajakaista.fi> References: <7D3571C9-9873-4D88-9666-A47D0CD77671@sn3rd.com> <1470821613.2539.44.camel@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: ilariliusvaara@welho.com Archived-At: Cc: "tls@ietf.org" Subject: Re: [TLS] early IANA code point assignment request for draft-ietf-tls-ecdhe-psk-aead X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2016 16:31:17 -0000 On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 04:22:59PM +0000, Xiaoyin Liu wrote: > Why does this draft normatively depend on TLS 1.3, even if the > cipher suites defined in this draft use the old syntax, which > TLS 1.3 no longer uses? I don't see any reason why it would normatively depend. If it claims to be so, IMO that is a mistake and such reference should be dropped (TLS 1.3 won't be able to use these anyway), or made in- formative, in case the text wants to make a passing reference to TLS 1.3. -Ilari