Re: [TLS] 4492 ECDH_anon

Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> Wed, 22 July 2015 17:21 UTC

Return-Path: <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B7CE1B2C04 for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 22 Jul 2015 10:21:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id j25BKhgO5wT8 for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 22 Jul 2015 10:21:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-yk0-x22b.google.com (mail-yk0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c07::22b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B2A041B2B80 for <tls@ietf.org>; Wed, 22 Jul 2015 10:20:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by ykfw194 with SMTP id w194so118038150ykf.0 for <tls@ietf.org>; Wed, 22 Jul 2015 10:20:52 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=jkixpNuiIWz3SseuEtJDs3nP9LwlzLVE+ayHct3kuHI=; b=Y8AWzCT+cKrglKg4XhI4Il/fAGdajDkPrquduAZ0RdhhtUJO77Y7O1N2bkrXxlz0va Rpfzhel6ZZmdD8331laK2qL5GrFFeRs3sAiUl294dSFvg99rnxR0ONZx+UHqQRr2OI3L I1VAV4gLfwq/i/bRGVJ/M6dhF4wrd73H/neXVv+WjB1VqgQeJni8qMG1zeI+U5kAY4rL ViaOWvoqJTb+yw3JxxcUll4iSr3rZ7FKGWK0RMyBp9LQk47ZG2H7vUQJMnZuYsLv4982 lLsHn4zoJWxn/aE3IX3H5lO2uoMbWF81MAtwCBnccE0o5wo5Nyvdic2IY6pcVE5q4b+k O51g==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.170.210.212 with SMTP id b203mr3609356ykf.110.1437585652170; Wed, 22 Jul 2015 10:20:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.129.110.138 with HTTP; Wed, 22 Jul 2015 10:20:52 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <67B411CE-E6DD-4BC4-BEE5-1513C5C3D0AE@gmail.com>
References: <CABkgnnV3b76rr=v2GVkcrFdJGomb_Yg91zU7yZLOXp5-onfLRA@mail.gmail.com> <E3B69C38-A84C-447C-BD0B-35CE69504854@gmail.com> <CABkgnnXEVw1X=uN1kzbVUZRSOZZ+Ow19czgM+fY+tSbLiDuSAQ@mail.gmail.com> <201507221307.10279.davemgarrett@gmail.com> <CABkgnnWgysMuTXvZx6DSP0X5OxP8Xfne_7o2LN2zZq8vQFJ-Vg@mail.gmail.com> <67B411CE-E6DD-4BC4-BEE5-1513C5C3D0AE@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2015 19:20:52 +0200
Message-ID: <CABkgnnUPXeMfFvfAG9h=YrfYPzPmmUKt=v1uoMPTRGyKiRXDWw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
To: Yoav Nir <ynir.ietf@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/q44uMwbzM13jR6Pgn6_WS08lLtA>
Cc: "tls@ietf.org" <tls@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [TLS] 4492 ECDH_anon
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2015 17:21:03 -0000

On 22 July 2015 at 19:12, Yoav Nir <ynir.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:
> I’d like to hear from the chairs if it’s OK to rename stuff in the IANA registry.
>
> That has some implications for implementations that use these names.
>
> Not to mention that the same issue applies to DH(E)_anon

I believe that renaming entries in the IANA registry is possible.  I
don't think that it affects implementations, though it might cause
some minor usability issues if people attempt to configure them using
the IANA names.