Re: [TLS] 0-RTT encrypted data limits

Ilari Liusvaara <ilariliusvaara@welho.com> Thu, 01 September 2016 13:44 UTC

Return-Path: <ilariliusvaara@welho.com>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4F9112D996 for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 1 Sep 2016 06:44:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.448
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.448 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.548] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id a_-P5MPO-bZY for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 1 Sep 2016 06:44:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from welho-filter2.welho.com (welho-filter2.welho.com [83.102.41.24]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2CF612DC7A for <tls@ietf.org>; Thu, 1 Sep 2016 06:15:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by welho-filter2.welho.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 583BCEE9B; Thu, 1 Sep 2016 16:15:22 +0300 (EEST)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at pp.htv.fi
Received: from welho-smtp3.welho.com ([IPv6:::ffff:83.102.41.86]) by localhost (welho-filter2.welho.com [::ffff:83.102.41.24]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id oL5ailFuzg8g; Thu, 1 Sep 2016 16:15:22 +0300 (EEST)
Received: from LK-Perkele-V2 (87-100-237-87.bb.dnainternet.fi [87.100.237.87]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by welho-smtp3.welho.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 22EA52320; Thu, 1 Sep 2016 16:15:22 +0300 (EEST)
Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2016 16:15:21 +0300
From: Ilari Liusvaara <ilariliusvaara@welho.com>
To: Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>
Message-ID: <20160901131521.rjw3jebdjwwizp2z@LK-Perkele-V2.elisa-laajakaista.fi>
References: <6918283.boJRZ9WqjH@pintsize.usersys.redhat.com> <CABcZeBMOyM2v3gt69gHzfW7k5w=OwFqCUiER-bPERfNkLGhpWQ@mail.gmail.com> <6822534.tPWjKYA1SU@pintsize.usersys.redhat.com> <CABcZeBN_TPyYD63u4t41SKn-T6ugZdpxgM8i7-tJ82tU13+yUA@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CABcZeBN_TPyYD63u4t41SKn-T6ugZdpxgM8i7-tJ82tU13+yUA@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: NeoMutt/ (1.7.0)
Sender: ilariliusvaara@welho.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/q9paXC5O_56O6nYcKlGtQzDFEqw>
Cc: "tls@ietf.org" <tls@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [TLS] 0-RTT encrypted data limits
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Sep 2016 13:44:57 -0000

On Thu, Sep 01, 2016 at 05:48:02AM -0700, Eric Rescorla wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 3:31 AM, Hubert Kario <hkario@redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> > I'm afraid that requiring the server to keep the connection open for
> > essentially arbitrary amount of time while it consumes garbage data is not
> > unlike the Apache slowloris attack.
> 
> It's not required to. It can close the connection at any time.

Should there be recommendation for clients to cut transfer and send
Finished if the client receives EncryptedExtensions without
early_data extension?


-Ilari