Re: [TLS] Proposed text for removing renegotiation

Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> Thu, 29 May 2014 16:27 UTC

Return-Path: <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9EB01A6F8A for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 29 May 2014 09:27:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ihgSuhD9Uhzo for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 29 May 2014 09:27:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wg0-x229.google.com (mail-wg0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c00::229]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 85CF51A6F7E for <tls@ietf.org>; Thu, 29 May 2014 09:27:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wg0-f41.google.com with SMTP id z12so662890wgg.0 for <tls@ietf.org>; Thu, 29 May 2014 09:27:27 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=pliv2QQP3udLsWu5FtGYNq+XCaaHZV8Lk+XXG1AqRuk=; b=ORjSn8a+MrEUrYEo689x/3m2D9qmBab0b5NZKZuNOTWTNJjp2/Hk92TBxD7WhsKW1Q Kgur07ajIkvlYwuzRQplGyDRn1qOC3L9/f+XtkJKTm/sF5DD1y7G7f1mtzvqXhsCMPw/ TSFlB0SidBPsG8j0SnRb6NfEG/XxH8uOobB+LwqiMPHZ4PuhiAGEb4wFvZ18Taw7+3Z4 4GbuKq8NBynkeZvItMwsVP0067O1wpiXiM4Qx9moszA8oMPLjK/5rKmoS8K+Fr9bv8vz 7ZVYHs2Uiu0hNpL2scaTPLdiVwi/IjvVvlzfDfpbtuC95UCseUT7EiCSFnmVb2RnjSNa MHRw==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.194.133.1 with SMTP id oy1mr12083781wjb.87.1401380846419; Thu, 29 May 2014 09:27:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.194.235.163 with HTTP; Thu, 29 May 2014 09:27:26 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <1414735395.16311772.1401366314379.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com>
References: <CABkgnnXaLKmxXL01hQEdxHSNGt3nZQQNBLDD5H2LqBzTo3vK4g@mail.gmail.com> <CAFewVt5GCmH8wSdUYLy_Q9RNEtAggzG3_k-9E8ME-nP9jZNX3Q@mail.gmail.com> <CABkgnnW0YAhsbMoN0JSdWWpxt9TsOWpvq3c67cw8_eyt4mprbA@mail.gmail.com> <m2vbspv8w1.fsf@localhost.localdomain> <CABkgnnWfM8eDALtGmpHBeHScy21fzTqv8+C0ajnDhAO=OBziZg@mail.gmail.com> <1414735395.16311772.1401366314379.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 29 May 2014 09:27:26 -0700
Message-ID: <CABkgnnWqqEnayrgAwVA-x_O5rkvWjtcH+g=TpE1Ztmk_JvuNYg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
To: Hubert Kario <hkario@redhat.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/qD1unoCUy7_5jaqafmWrYhOGeRg
Cc: Geoffrey Keating <geoffk@geoffk.org>, "tls@ietf.org" <tls@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [TLS] Proposed text for removing renegotiation
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 May 2014 16:27:35 -0000

On 29 May 2014 05:25, Hubert Kario <hkario@redhat.com> wrote:
> Transferring 64GB of data with TLS over loopback on a relatively modern
> machine (even without AES-NI) takes less than an hour. I wouldn't
> call it going to great lengths to test.

Seriously?  You think that's an acceptable time to wait for a single
test case to run?  With a message, the test will take milliseconds (as
all tests should).