[TLS] WG review of draft-ietf-tls-rfc4492bis

Sean Turner <sean@sn3rd.com> Tue, 11 April 2017 13:09 UTC

Return-Path: <sean@sn3rd.com>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40D54129B9B for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 11 Apr 2017 06:09:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=sn3rd.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lhnwmk9BwVsk for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 11 Apr 2017 06:09:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qt0-x229.google.com (mail-qt0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c0d::229]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B8109128B4E for <tls@ietf.org>; Tue, 11 Apr 2017 06:09:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qt0-x229.google.com with SMTP id v3so80397318qtd.3 for <tls@ietf.org>; Tue, 11 Apr 2017 06:09:07 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sn3rd.com; s=google; h=from:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:subject:message-id:date :to; bh=TKR+UmeaCn+vGyVw8Z8HLAFqtpnXEUTYbM/+keY7How=; b=KLgel5CsAPCAn9tVKWAAaO5lnCRs1qVP6Vs7ZNAW+hkarsTnQx0RNu9VC8e8FOd/iK GR3Xo+9mxyvtmHHT8x97k+wd+KxEumyWSMYZoAXNx+qepb/7lRvC61NUluqCBqUqu0Nv qRUDpY4vVZr0O4unirWTd82bHoVfs0O4rm3+g=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :subject:message-id:date:to; bh=TKR+UmeaCn+vGyVw8Z8HLAFqtpnXEUTYbM/+keY7How=; b=m0sWho4UoHXXHmvIzBhqU6G5l64xTTxBtp3+/04ltJjDkGYnq9DSmPO54YPhbgVcnZ P2v6neNTwT2PvMWGzZSndmj+m6BUt11tT+dgS0BFz11umzqrDS5Ao56QcGYJ1ZjznC2C lLmNSnX+7jsndtXcgI7kdSOjmNRjzcQrt5EFZI0dFPJA34UNpqDa48b4A/B/Io8TKK1x HbGWuv7fLz4wjyawnTW2Cn37vIE9x6AUMpfkL05FJzDaO8UXOtFa34fkbOaqjv0Hs1Ok U8Wdr1hWqx0phONbR7OV8/z89vHCyIPm3e3Ds4+izHXEAkHvvPYLKEiv3GGxvPsbrVno OAJg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AFeK/H3SPO0VlPyYOps3j5xU/ZH/pdv0rwOzwu6s/HGVSEyiHLH8KSi4KpdXRAgJQVx+dg==
X-Received: by 10.200.33.182 with SMTP id 51mr61579312qty.65.1491916146537; Tue, 11 Apr 2017 06:09:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [172.16.0.18] ([96.231.229.219]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id c26sm6312980qte.19.2017.04.11.06.09.05 for <tls@ietf.org> (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 11 Apr 2017 06:09:05 -0700 (PDT)
From: Sean Turner <sean@sn3rd.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.3 \(3273\))
Message-Id: <F7262846-0E93-4780-B051-8DB1253ADCE5@sn3rd.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2017 09:09:04 -0400
To: "<tls@ietf.org>" <tls@ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3273)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/qXDxOpscwGXQgK2mJkcn8zN1W30>
Subject: [TLS] WG review of draft-ietf-tls-rfc4492bis
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2017 13:09:14 -0000

All,

draft-ietf-tls-rfc4492bis has been revised since it left the WG and we agree with Yoav’s statement at the mic in Chicago that the WG should review the changes before we ask Kathleen (our newly appointed AD) to continue progressing the draft.  Please review the differences from the -12 version that went through WGLC and the latest version [0] and let us know by 20170426 whether there is anything that would stop progression of the draft.

Thanks,

J&S

[0] https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url1=draft-ietf-tls-rfc4492bis-12&url2=draft-ietf-tls-rfc4492bis-16