Re: [TLS] Adoption call for draft-rescorla-tls-ctls

["Valery Smyslov" <[e-mail]>]

Hi,

I think it's a good starting point. I support adoption.

Regards,
Valery.

> At IETF 105, ekr presented cTLS (Compact TLS) [0][1][2] to both the TLS WG
> and the LAKE BOF, which is now a chartered WG [3].  After some
discussions,
> the ADs suggested [4] that the TLS WG consider whether this draft be
adopted
> as a TLS WG item. LAKE could then later specify/refer/adopt/profile it, as
> appropriate. The authors revised cTLS and presented the revised draft at
IETF
> 106 [5].  At IETF 106 there was support for adoption of cTLS as a WG item.
To
> confirm this on the list: if you believe that the TLS WG should not adopt
this as
> a WG item, then please let the chairs know by posting a message to the TLS
list
> by 2359 UTC 13 December 2019 (and say why).
> 
> NOTE:
> : If the consensus is that this draft should be adopted as a WG item, then
this
> will necessarily result in a WG rechartering discussions.  We would have
gotten
> to this rechartering discussion anyway now that DTLS 1.3 is progressing
out of
> the WG.
> 
> Thanks,
> Chris, Joe, and Sean
> 
> [0] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/slides-105-tls-sessa-ctls/
> [1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-rescorla-tls-ctls/
> [2] https://github.com/ekr/draft-rescorla-tls-ctls
> [3] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-rescorla-tls-ctls/
> [4]
> https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lake/kACwW7PXrmTRa4PvXQ0TA34xCv
> k
> [5]
https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/106/materials/slides-106-tls-compact-
> tls-13-00.pdf
> _______________________________________________
> TLS mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls