[TLS] Potential New Handshake Flows for TLS 1.3

Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com> Tue, 05 November 2013 21:09 UTC

Return-Path: <ekr@rtfm.com>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 510AB11E8175 for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 Nov 2013 13:09:47 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.559
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.559 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.417, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id N9yAoFMfIwBK for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 Nov 2013 13:09:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-wg0-f52.google.com (mail-wg0-f52.google.com []) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1AC6D11E81EB for <tls@ietf.org>; Tue, 5 Nov 2013 13:09:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-wg0-f52.google.com with SMTP id k14so4114253wgh.7 for <tls@ietf.org>; Tue, 05 Nov 2013 13:09:36 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; bh=z6atyFFNJVyMD1Xcbzw5haKj1e6R5LleQ8X+XTp2HR4=; b=Nmmip0/7xnx78SSZe7GXyMLcwvDtJn2Qv/0x9Oh+s5ugX39QX7KieYezwGnaDekySc CKQzfW+9EDAXj8axCpA73DoCetwGX48o5CVmB/DuVbSLW+D0dDw0uUl8xbQWqTzy7rAC 3+7YtMKkBA7sJbm5nDuceBpasemBbt666e0vbNPmmgujp8jUuj3En5rRCfypcL8YJaVV ZfYJIWWB5IJ9EoToc43YmNs3jHnTu/uJVHQfbBflHWa98EWp8H3PYy/iGvh2FDh/hS2J H3qVTVSgePkyqtbE6ttTchoRfGcWoGqxtZEYz5jEufjL3/pYBQOoXBAaqJTQHGRdfPj6 PH0A==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlsxlS6leZAjtmLu+niS9xWX2UwiNB+yiRNY7oNAVHZuuCzaFBHsl8EovSKojuCgRurwriO
X-Received: by with SMTP id wc5mr19953168wjc.23.1383685776019; Tue, 05 Nov 2013 13:09:36 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by with HTTP; Tue, 5 Nov 2013 13:08:55 -0800 (PST)
X-Originating-IP: [2001:67c:370:176:6970:964c:adc8:66fa]
From: Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2013 13:08:55 -0800
Message-ID: <CABcZeBPcJW7juru-RsYM+_of8xTd8Nk0xRJApztcmoEh3r-EoQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: "tls@ietf.org" <tls@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e013d19cc292abb04ea747396
Subject: [TLS] Potential New Handshake Flows for TLS 1.3
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tls>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Nov 2013 21:09:47 -0000

I've just submitted a document on potentially new reduced RT/more
private protocol flows for TLS 1.3. It's fairly handwavy ATM but I wanted
to err on the side of getting some of the ideas out for discussion
so we could figure out which avenues we want to pursue. This draft
borrows (steals) liberally from a bunch of prior work too numerous
to name here.

I'll be going over some of this material at today's meeting, but seeing
as how this just got delivered, I'll make sure you don't need to have
read the draft to follow along.

Sorry about the late delivery....


Filename:        draft-rescorla-tls13-new-flows
Revision:        00
Title:           New Handshake Flows for TLS 1.3
Creation date:   2013-11-05
Group:           Individual Submission
Number of pages: 21

   This document sketches some potential new handshake flows for TLS