Re: [TLS] TLS 1.3 Problem?

Rob Sayre <sayrer@gmail.com> Tue, 29 September 2020 00:52 UTC

Return-Path: <sayrer@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B2853A048A for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 28 Sep 2020 17:52:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id f6SDIfC9CYzG for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 28 Sep 2020 17:51:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-io1-xd31.google.com (mail-io1-xd31.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::d31]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 37E203A0486 for <tls@ietf.org>; Mon, 28 Sep 2020 17:51:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-io1-xd31.google.com with SMTP id u6so3092592iow.9 for <tls@ietf.org>; Mon, 28 Sep 2020 17:51:59 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=CLGHESQSjbyQoJA3Rcd2bS5Uux5ibSIgdqEOYovN330=; b=mGe4+6xMkngOb8mnxPx4EvwALKVNmIzBnSHzQ49CGYynXTLq/qCVXJtIWvCq3FEO04 WDWh0q5z9+CY/7vswuIpGwYQKMuIxA4a1lDH/jO1dxevUwC0v3iPXz/y3oFwEaOBqTsk WP1sp75HoyCdVsMNUPJQoTWsLU7Ht04JjJN9PuCRfbDFl1tAhOTIo0K1T75v5S7C/ggt cTGuzo49XumSUGLb6CZpV8DndSnjgUVLBUfJ8cYfo5A7PpR3csACh2IHMTXmKTD4At33 sTAYx98Q8rmBp7dhXkmLdWZ+trwnYqbmMk1tdIv8KX1pHBYSGwdKw/u0BAbLY1F6sJpr IDDA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=CLGHESQSjbyQoJA3Rcd2bS5Uux5ibSIgdqEOYovN330=; b=W5dnxmCXZwUqEFFNf++8UuJ8E8ms3G5MrCVRmfQ2bgOYmhzGWywQDPzjXVo5njOcbk oc+8cJI6jOXvaVlUAgh8aetmfsoZT5bpp36QTcW8Fbb33yu/L5/zter5YKlzG+/JUmEc dTvx94st3AG33nItLc1VGLmfMZ0v5TQIyJNYKcoXwQDT57PTZijiN7qNFVD3NzvV5SJl 74Fr7xn/t1Oz1IBaexINbwWAQ6WmVboHJkpFnaOD/eWrpFxZM9IFEv9D2rQhp/bKHD5G a0XzBtX3Ccv/pnqiP/abWGbHmGd27ar9sRRBgYKT2uHxtMQaoQBD9Ene2OFzN3zmriKq PV2A==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530AlVZxjvWLHeiZ81W7HZLr+0Oxre0Qio2jIsLtVEDBbjCXXksO vIVKUYW6N8MoZY1aIFcCTmTGIq1Kmk19L4Zg+ig=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwHqiywQ7h3xaTPZ7YjenoTWmhnHg7KcGfUICIoN7KCXcseiRdmlAIiPjrsFub8JIGyrcrXfxkgy+xefjq1yTM=
X-Received: by 2002:a02:a615:: with SMTP id c21mr1024265jam.106.1601340718315; Mon, 28 Sep 2020 17:51:58 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <0c31f2d6-5f8e-2fd6-9a1a-08b7902dd135@pobox.com> <AM0PR08MB37164F2D0E0CE5FB6D62D461FA350@AM0PR08MB3716.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com> <1c7e2f31-8a9e-4bd8-9e80-ab18ebeb609f@www.fastmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <1c7e2f31-8a9e-4bd8-9e80-ab18ebeb609f@www.fastmail.com>
From: Rob Sayre <sayrer@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2020 17:51:46 -0700
Message-ID: <CAChr6SwNGDk0+kCH-eykAY3-XRpsL3y_sfiWQcYmuJxccL47+g@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Michael D'Errico" <mike-list@pobox.com>
Cc: "TLS@ietf.org" <tls@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000adfcd505b06930b2"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/qptC6_1wxTQVppc3DTtIA3T1uZc>
Subject: Re: [TLS] TLS 1.3 Problem?
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2020 00:52:00 -0000

On Mon, Sep 28, 2020 at 3:33 PM Michael D'Errico <mike-list@pobox.com>
wrote:

> On Mon, Sep 28, 2020, at 11:07, Hannes Tschofenig wrote:
> >
> > Luckily, we don't have any angry cryptographers in this group.
>
> Were they all pushed away too?
>

I don't think this is very likely. The TLS list can get a bit competitive,
but other IETF lists (say, anything related to DNS), are much worse.

thanks,
Rob