IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [TLS] Publication of draft-rhrd-tls-tls13-visibility-00

Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie> Fri, 20 October 2017 13:54 UTC

Return-Path: <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69C0A1286C7 for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 20 Oct 2017 06:54:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.301
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.301 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cs.tcd.ie
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JVLM037IaV3c for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 20 Oct 2017 06:54:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mercury.scss.tcd.ie (mercury.scss.tcd.ie [134.226.56.6]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8FCF91270AE for <tls@ietf.org>; Fri, 20 Oct 2017 06:54:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mercury.scss.tcd.ie (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F987BE3E; Fri, 20 Oct 2017 14:54:03 +0100 (IST)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at scss.tcd.ie
Received: from mercury.scss.tcd.ie ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mercury.scss.tcd.ie [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jD0dnypL0NuP; Fri, 20 Oct 2017 14:54:02 +0100 (IST)
Received: from [10.244.2.100] (95-45-153-252-dynamic.agg2.phb.bdt-fng.eircom.net [95.45.153.252]) by mercury.scss.tcd.ie (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 52192BE24; Fri, 20 Oct 2017 14:54:01 +0100 (IST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cs.tcd.ie; s=mail; t=1508507641; bh=8Y8IPFSLR58TGkrVvVxI2TYyiS+IeRezYcMgNmRuICk=; h=Subject:To:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=xWqk/ReD5nhxZuR/qtTZGXQHrqQcfx1GkpqTH4lG3ixGlsITzyLguULZ5HpoJ/7k9 k9VqWdFLG5m8XO7C8e3Sbr1NpNN3JajVFvSaQyY0nukSifD4DfKmr0JkJD/hYfg8c5 0ReKsaQwRIblyf9+uomFahDi+jrDrne9b5bk30uA=
To: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com>, Darin Pettis <dpp.edco@gmail.com>, "tls@ietf.org" <tls@ietf.org>
References: <7E6C8F1F-D341-456B-9A48-79FA7FEC0BC1@gmail.com> <a599d6ad-54db-e525-17d6-6ea882880021@akamai.com> <71e75d23f4544735a9731c4ec3dc7048@venafi.com> <3D2E3E26-B2B9-4B04-9704-0BBEE2E2A8F7@akamai.com> <000501d348e5$1f273450$5d759cf0$@equio.com> <70837127-37AB-4132-9535-4A0EB072BA41@akamai.com> <e8417cc424fe4bf3b240416dfffd807a@venafi.com> <B11A4F30-2F87-4310-A2F0-397582E78E1D@akamai.com> <fd12a8a8c29e4c7f9e9192e1a1d972d6@venafi.com> <D2CAAA44-339E-4B41-BCE0-865C76B50E2F@akamai.com> <d76828f02fc34287a961eba21901247b@venafi.com> <56687FEC-508F-4457-83CC-7C379387240D@akamai.com> <c1c0d010293c449481f8751c3b85d6ae@venafi.com> <4167392E-07FB-46D5-9FBC-4773881BFD2C@akamai.com> <3d5a0c1aab3e4ceb85ff631f8365618f@venafi.com> <E84889BB-08B3-4A3A-AE3A-687874B16440@akamai.com> <CAPBBiVQvtQbD4j3ofpCmG63MEyRWF15VL90NOTjeNqUOiyo6xg@mail.gmail.com> <9013424B-4F6D-4185-9BFD-EC454FF80F22@akamai.com>
From: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
Openpgp: id=D66EA7906F0B897FB2E97D582F3C8736805F8DA2; url=
Message-ID: <d18d8e26-33ef-2147-8755-4d0b86b0a45f@cs.tcd.ie>
Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2017 14:54:00 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <9013424B-4F6D-4185-9BFD-EC454FF80F22@akamai.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha256"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="8kNeK43BQ8E8EHVosI3AqQOwLt68VEWB5"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/qxbHX9UJXKpHsPFs3-uSqrn63gg>
Subject: Re: [TLS] Publication of draft-rhrd-tls-tls13-visibility-00
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2017 13:54:06 -0000

Minor clarification...

On 20/10/17 14:44, Salz, Rich wrote:
>  Some members of the WG rose up and wanted explicit opt-in

I don't think "wanted" is quite right. Some
WG participants (e.g. me) wanted nothing like
this to ever be done in the IETF. Others did
comment that the lack of client opt-in was a
bad aspect of draft-green, but I'm not sure
that anyone clearly said "I do want draft-green
snooping, but with client opt-in."

S.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email