Re: [TLS] No more GMT exposure in the handshake

Bill Frantz <frantz@pwpconsult.com> Sun, 08 June 2014 16:43 UTC

Return-Path: <frantz@pwpconsult.com>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06A3E1A0092 for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 8 Jun 2014 09:43:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lneQnYLiRMgB for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 8 Jun 2014 09:43:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from elasmtp-galgo.atl.sa.earthlink.net (elasmtp-galgo.atl.sa.earthlink.net [209.86.89.61]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 598DA1A0089 for <tls@ietf.org>; Sun, 8 Jun 2014 09:43:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [173.75.83.174] (helo=Williams-MacBook-Pro.local) by elasmtp-galgo.atl.sa.earthlink.net with esmtpa (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from <frantz@pwpconsult.com>) id 1WtgBQ-0004jv-Lt; Sun, 08 Jun 2014 12:43:00 -0400
Date: Sun, 8 Jun 2014 09:43:00 -0700
From: Bill Frantz <frantz@pwpconsult.com>
To: Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be>
X-Priority: 3
In-Reply-To: <20140608101721.GA6189@roeckx.be>
Message-ID: <r422Ps-1075i-7184AAA4F57A49239C799722AD2816B6@Williams-MacBook-Pro.local>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Mailer: Mailsmith 2.3.1 (422)
X-ELNK-Trace: 3a5e54fa03f1b3e21aa676d7e74259b7b3291a7d08dfec799f2358dd76db645854529c7512f7b522350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c
X-Originating-IP: 173.75.83.174
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/r8oi5eb0dmBxFOi_h67iQ0SlBPQ
Cc: tls@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [TLS] No more GMT exposure in the handshake
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 Jun 2014 16:43:04 -0000

On 6/8/14 at 3:17 AM, kurt@roeckx.be (Kurt Roeckx) wrote:

>Anyway, how do you plan to deal with checking the status of the
>certificate if you don't know what the current time is?

It seems to be a poor policy to trust time information from a 
server whose certificate you are trying to validate.

Cheers - Bill

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Bill Frantz        | Truth and love must prevail  | Periwinkle
(408)356-8506      | over lies and hate.          | 16345 
Englewood Ave
www.pwpconsult.com |               - Vaclav Havel | Los Gatos, 
CA 95032