[TLS] More fraud: lack of Consensus Call for draft-housley-tls-authz (fwd)
Dean Anderson <dean@av8.com> Mon, 08 March 2010 16:19 UTC
Return-Path: <dean@av8.com>
X-Original-To: tls@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2789E3A69EF for <tls@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 8 Mar 2010 08:19:25 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.249
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.249 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.350, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4DrtFHlSlMOD for <tls@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 8 Mar 2010 08:19:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: from cirrus.av8.net (cirrus.av8.net [130.105.36.66]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C17303A6A1D for <tls@ietf.org>; Mon, 8 Mar 2010 08:19:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: from citation2.av8.net (citation2.av8.net [130.105.12.10]) (authenticated bits=0) by cirrus.av8.net (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id o28GJNAO018352 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO) for <tls@ietf.org>; Mon, 8 Mar 2010 11:19:23 -0500
Date: Mon, 08 Mar 2010 11:19:23 -0500
From: Dean Anderson <dean@av8.com>
X-X-Sender: dean@citation2.av8.net
To: tls@ietf.org
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44.1003081115250.30318-100000@citation2.av8.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset="US-ASCII"
Subject: [TLS] More fraud: lack of Consensus Call for draft-housley-tls-authz (fwd)
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tls>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Mar 2010 16:19:25 -0000
Seems that despite no consensus on this draft, a code point is still issued to the draft. While the IETF could approve an experimental draft, without a consensus, the IANA cannot approve a code point. One wonders if there is really interest in having a TLS-AUTHZ standard, but I guess perhaps the persistent effort at deceptions shows that there is interest in having a TLS-AUTHZ standard, and so I will submit one that isn't patented. --Dean ---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Sat, 6 Mar 2010 20:09:07 -0500 (EST) From: Dean Anderson <dean@av8.com> To: Tadayuki Abraham HATTORI <taddyhatty@nifty.com> Cc: ietf-honest@lists.iadl.org, ietf@ietf.org, "Contreras, Jorge" <Jorge.Contreras@wilmerhale.com> Subject: More fraud: lack of Consensus Call for draft-housley-tls-authz I see that a new draft of the covertly patented draft-housley-tls-authz (9) has been submitted in October 2009. Worse, looking at the datatracker for the draft just now, it appears that the IESG seems to be moving ahead without a consensus. The 4th consensus call was last March, and the draft AGAIN overwhelmingly failed to obtain a consensus, by what is arguably one of the largest margins in IETF history. The IANA continues to list a code point for TLS-AUTHZ, even though this document is dead, and has no hope of standardization at the level needed for a code point assignment. What is up with these underhanded activities? How do you suppose this isn't a fraud on the government (IANA)? --Dean On Sun, 22 Mar 2009, Tadayuki Abraham HATTORI wrote: > Dear experts, > > > > The most important essence of network security is fundamental understanding > of randomness. For example, the intensity of cipher system depends upon the > artificial generator of randomness . > > > > There might be no need to say, the strict definition of randomness for human > being have to be based upon mathematical definition of intelligence of human > being. In other words, without theoretical completion of A.I. like a thought > human being, any achievements within computer science could be fantasy or > hypnotism in near future. > > > > The essence of randomness is based upon two types of difficulties for > observers. One is a difficulty to predict, and another is a difficulty to > find out features and regulation within the system for observers of > phenomenon of this world, Isn't it? > > > > As you may know, some artificial random number generators are implemented > based upon traditional mathematical formulas. If observers know the > formulas, it could be easy to be predicted. Essentially, the difficulty to > predict within a generator of randomness depends upon each state of mind of > each people. So, the essence of perfect-randomness-generator is brought out > by finding out an adequate statistics of "state" of mind o' people. The > statistics should/could be involved in a kind of public political > communication system including decomposition and reformaton of mass-media, > election or voting. A kind of public confidential hypothesis or theorem of > new coneptual coputer network and A.I. is required for that purpose. > > > > Sincerely, > > > > Be careful of evil rumor and whispering, > > Abraham TaddyHatty > taddyhatty at acm dot org > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Ietf mailing list > Ietf@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf > > -- Av8 Internet Prepared to pay a premium for better service? www.av8.net faster, more reliable, better service 617 256 5494
- [TLS] More fraud: lack of Consensus Call for draf… Dean Anderson