Re: [TLS] WGLC for "Deprecating TLSv1.0 and TLSv1.1"

"Martin Thomson" <> Sat, 13 April 2019 04:15 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BCB512004C for <>; Fri, 12 Apr 2019 21:15:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.701
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.701 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.b=Gsqwc32b; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.b=auEr6Lnj
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yEz0UCL8z_9O for <>; Fri, 12 Apr 2019 21:15:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8774912000F for <>; Fri, 12 Apr 2019 21:15:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.internal []) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id E54765C2 for <>; Sat, 13 Apr 2019 00:15:54 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from imap2 ([]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Sat, 13 Apr 2019 00:15:55 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; h=mime-version:message-id:in-reply-to:references:date:from:to :subject:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=fm2; bh=dNYTR TlrRogXBP2ImRvuvjNLTVTBSTkEZeQIZ4HCv28=; b=Gsqwc32bAG0l7whfReNGH nP9fp/6yks1LqIzNfV2gzAsS0aTLHPh00F8R84ENkozXM867/6+ISkCM2gS0O1NF N1UrvwvUb6TltNdkWXIpqmn5taJkeVyCy4Tl24AzbaEtxnrq1U/bI2P1h970m8VH 0zwj+1QEO17nOhz+S9X9Gtcc+CBpnZuulcw32qqOm5ylw4f5pcYBZb+UF0eBpJ+M 6PHgzdkrreFyS/QNse/vGKYdq0ajJFU83c+B8RTNRTIh8lE3NFa3AqIT5YDXdXEj lXE6rK8whLr/FVCxRmXTVRvpRuEEdaEYrGsx7JCE7jtGcP+FYJhO4VwoKvfYaxbW g==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=; h=content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=dNYTRTlrRogXBP2ImRvuvjNLTVTBSTkEZeQIZ4HCv 28=; b=auEr6Lnjoi8BG+jnRj0WDjS3zt0h+caVY0r/MtsG95g6pjOZif8SX95OR R+DXmIGpwbaQpZs//5c8ykQTAPEa5uMC5FlLBnRNtqwxVtyr4vNkJ/LuAANtRkJ+ EqPLQ+A6AIKORYbu5rNXv+t9mJ7SQMW6RaeZ2pi9gka8Tbp06n+pY4nm16YG98LJ pa2L15rvHdJqj8Opgpf851tefgxUvyE7a2ZbJbs7zN7b//8hhJ9oVpxZ4MftiUD9 f9bxZm9weUnW8Xh/HJpVbeUXcSSG18YtRK2iYyxLftrSaTCtDX19RbmkCqToA4xr XZPi3MmGKBZneX+/FpDf2IZv44mjg==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:emKxXOGycFBgiqArDo83I9CMuQRsXUX9CDz3-90OHM2gzA4xZ4O1uw>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduuddrvdeggddukecutefuodetggdotefrodftvf curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecu uegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecunecujfgurhepofgfggfkjghffffhvffutgfgsehtqh ertderreejnecuhfhrohhmpedfofgrrhhtihhnucfvhhhomhhsohhnfdcuoehmtheslhho figvnhhtrhhophihrdhnvghtqeenucffohhmrghinhepihgvthhfrdhorhhgnecurfgrrh grmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehmtheslhhofigvnhhtrhhophihrdhnvghtnecuvehluhhs thgvrhfuihiivgeptd
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:emKxXP-_AeeSv6Z-2pAApchbW24TBNLKmuR8iE8YcrAY9MVNy4noog> <xmx:emKxXDSp42X7JDgk4Hg0MkGyfROZTKB-HLUz5Dy5XpKacN7jOeqIkA> <xmx:emKxXMrNjhp0MRrHB_UlWnORKPhOiY5baArKLNcMLYL47olg-Fjukg> <xmx:emKxXDKC0zQgOSbnFApfGyS658EoIwClxxtLcSCJmEJkz_8iHlvvRA>
Received: by mailuser.nyi.internal (Postfix, from userid 501) id E6A1F7C132; Sat, 13 Apr 2019 00:15:53 -0400 (EDT)
X-Mailer: Webmail Interface
User-Agent: Cyrus-JMAP/3.1.6-332-g22ddc6a-fmstable-20190412v1
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Me-Personality: 92534000
Message-Id: <>
In-Reply-To: <>
References: <>
Date: Sat, 13 Apr 2019 00:15:55 -0400
From: "Martin Thomson" <>
Content-Type: text/plain;charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <>
Subject: Re: [TLS] WGLC for "Deprecating TLSv1.0 and TLSv1.1"
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 13 Apr 2019 04:15:58 -0000

Section 1.1 doesn't say *how* those listed documents are updated.  Might pay to include a few works on how.

Section 2 can be cut down a lot.  The quote from another document is longer than the rest of the text.  In many ways, saying that the IETF is moving last is not a great thing to memorialize in RFC, as much as it is useful in an Internet-Draft or in argumentation in support of publication of the doc.

The title of Section 3 could be a bit clearer.

It might pay to explain what RFC 7525 is in Section 6.  Why does that document warrant special attention over the 70-odd other ones.

Otherwise, publish this.

On Sat, Apr 13, 2019, at 09:28, Christopher Wood wrote:
> This is the working group last call for the "Deprecating TLSv1.0 and 
> TLSv1.1” draft available at:
> Please review the document and send your comments to the list by April 26, 2019.
> Thanks,
> Chris, Joe, and Sean
> _______________________________________________
> TLS mailing list