Re: [TLS] Re-thinking OPTLS

"Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com> Sat, 22 November 2014 16:55 UTC

Return-Path: <rsalz@akamai.com>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 319601ACD28 for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 22 Nov 2014 08:55:15 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.794
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.794 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.594] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JvhNREb7u-9N for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 22 Nov 2014 08:55:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: from prod-mail-xrelay02.akamai.com (prod-mail-xrelay02.akamai.com [72.246.2.14]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93A231ACD27 for <tls@ietf.org>; Sat, 22 Nov 2014 08:55:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: from prod-mail-xrelay02.akamai.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by postfix.imss70 (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7EAD284C1; Sat, 22 Nov 2014 16:55:11 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from prod-mail-relay07.akamai.com (prod-mail-relay07.akamai.com [172.17.121.112]) by prod-mail-xrelay02.akamai.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A545D284AE; Sat, 22 Nov 2014 16:55:11 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from email.msg.corp.akamai.com (usma1ex-cas3.msg.corp.akamai.com [172.27.123.32]) by prod-mail-relay07.akamai.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0C438004A; Sat, 22 Nov 2014 16:55:11 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from usma1ex-cashub7.kendall.corp.akamai.com (172.27.105.23) by usma1ex-dag1mb5.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.123.105) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.913.22; Sat, 22 Nov 2014 11:54:41 -0500
Received: from USMBX1.msg.corp.akamai.com ([169.254.1.19]) by usma1ex-cashub7.kendall.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.105.23]) with mapi; Sat, 22 Nov 2014 11:54:41 -0500
From: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com>
To: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>, Hugo Krawczyk <hugo@ee.technion.ac.il>
Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2014 11:54:40 -0500
Thread-Topic: [TLS] Re-thinking OPTLS
Thread-Index: AdAF8yZnWQrRimkiQNewuvh1GkOP0gAgaFuA
Message-ID: <2A0EFB9C05D0164E98F19BB0AF3708C71D5211D3AF@USMBX1.msg.corp.akamai.com>
References: <CADi0yUMCGuYbqrJWa-KXNmgNvc19xOWwpx2DCLOvgv62haedCQ@mail.gmail.com> <CABkgnnU7RNxjNW++qoS+zY6RBCag3tmCaWiR7Szw_zu45_X7HA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CABkgnnU7RNxjNW++qoS+zY6RBCag3tmCaWiR7Szw_zu45_X7HA@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/s9D5dQ2aj5N2KgF6L0r0eDkL-Oc
Cc: "tls@ietf.org" <tls@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [TLS] Re-thinking OPTLS
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2014 16:55:15 -0000

> I don't think that this is at all the concern.

Some of us have this concern, and discussed it off-list with WG "management" who didn't disagree.

But if the consensus is that this is not an issue, then not only am I okay with it, I think that this is very good news.