Re: [TLS] TLS@IETF101 Agenda Posted

Joseph Salowey <joe@salowey.net> Tue, 13 March 2018 16:09 UTC

Return-Path: <joe@salowey.net>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7AE4F12DA41 for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 13 Mar 2018 09:09:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=salowey-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id m4nYwUxLNExB for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 13 Mar 2018 09:09:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pl0-x233.google.com (mail-pl0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c01::233]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 511B312E038 for <tls@ietf.org>; Tue, 13 Mar 2018 09:09:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pl0-x233.google.com with SMTP id f5-v6so53864plj.13 for <tls@ietf.org>; Tue, 13 Mar 2018 09:09:41 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=salowey-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=+Lng+S+hBfPIf7AfSG6RETcHPkhEyw+C/uk/ShumX8E=; b=VBuqmeHbihEd2iHFG1J9C5VXD0jlPWN87qn2UOyMKoPQEYna7MhTupH29RxwhfEHPy cPFUKXmrfidv27YE6WRemKB8aLenpupSjyxh8/iCacEygbFiWbYIsUz60sOhgIYe5vLc BvYz/qVG+dQpHSJGOK9iB5XilyqiOtBF2Af9E4hKKNpdDniD6dw1MX3Yev9v8vEgpHxh YjKo3alNU4zc9d/SclHdqtacaIfTrglKLSjNhGC5cN6PSsiKkftONqXxQBBcEZwPJpKZ DO3sviIpex8BxJxrjsmkVdB8DfSaJ1rBozHttPNCMF9AH2Gs7eh06cRjKoUDz7xi246o kEPg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=+Lng+S+hBfPIf7AfSG6RETcHPkhEyw+C/uk/ShumX8E=; b=RMIgF1/ePsuXiM2CMghOWCgkqhcfaku21FT5bAeO5f8kgXE4/5JiL1L7C7ZqBM4N5r 7vNysckWlc122lwhnB7niowyS5DxlsJKJJQNGWIhT/BaU4/Dkcqxu3N7c8GHcB1eyHol 7bnBxCEmQH6GBwqCrR1lobgl1/Nn7rXSMqZqCA8wchmbv4k2anhRQczcQvv6plv5Wtsu KpdS4IPoxHMN3FVq0VyU0HtNaj3YIwhycWQlyK32gaSTzUJ+kZ66/BFBfZkhzGmXgjCo +Q9rxMXRdea9mVGDU8IgkAwaEfVt0f5mSuzrb5aaWNxNVhomZzunTcs0DyNHtfZjo7r8 cS4A==
X-Gm-Message-State: AElRT7GxN3pcMvtE13cuT9EOevBBy5AFpnMU0F8e1sEpY0PpVoPKFZk5 jdsw/sv/uYNoB12CAwFEdQi9cRb/DUYX3Kb/qwVLPcdt
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AG47ELvapCwrDrHIROZdP+IuRE/YcVBlhDlKSHLWZp8hwPjqIL9WeeNaRl6obNssvIB+veLmrGd/+BgYeittZwYKSYY=
X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:407:: with SMTP id 7-v6mr1031204ple.47.1520957380912; Tue, 13 Mar 2018 09:09:40 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.100.185.5 with HTTP; Tue, 13 Mar 2018 09:09:20 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAPsNn2XCNtqZaQM6Bg8uoMZRJE+qQakEwvw8Cn9fBm-5H+Xn_A@mail.gmail.com>
References: <6140B7A6-A1C7-44BC-9C65-9BE0D5E1B580@sn3rd.com> <986797a7-81b0-7874-5f39-afe83c86635b@cs.tcd.ie> <CAOgPGoBYc7O+qmjM-ptkRkE6mRsOYgc5O7Wu9pm3drFp3TVa6Q@mail.gmail.com> <d7dfdc1a-2c96-fd88-df1b-3167fe0f804b@cs.tcd.ie> <CAHbuEH7E8MhFcMt2GSngSrGxN=6bU6LD49foPC-mdoUZboH_0Q@mail.gmail.com> <1a024320-c674-6f75-ccc4-d27b75e3d017@nomountain.net> <2ed0gc.p5dcxd.31eoyz-qmf@mercury.scss.tcd.ie> <d7ec110f-2a0b-cf97-94a3-eeb5594d8c24@cs.tcd.ie> <CAAF6GDcaG7nousyQ6wotEg4dW8PFuXi=riH2702eZZn2fwfLQw@mail.gmail.com> <CAPsNn2XCNtqZaQM6Bg8uoMZRJE+qQakEwvw8Cn9fBm-5H+Xn_A@mail.gmail.com>
From: Joseph Salowey <joe@salowey.net>
Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2018 09:09:20 -0700
Message-ID: <CAOgPGoAC2hBEihiuh-0Yx3dYUqgQbieBTitk9O=EUj4dcUkeDw@mail.gmail.com>
To: nalini elkins <nalini.elkins@e-dco.com>
Cc: =?UTF-8?Q?Colm_MacC=C3=A1rthaigh?= <colm@allcosts.net>, "<tls@ietf.org>" <tls@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000687b6f05674d7c72"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/s9ORfb0qxCzcfe-i1uK6cOPv7uI>
Subject: Re: [TLS] TLS@IETF101 Agenda Posted
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2018 16:09:55 -0000

The consensus (as judge by the chairs) was that there no clear consensus to
shut the discussion down.  It was not that work on internal solution is
needed.