Re: [TLS] Updated TLS-LTS draft posted
Joseph Lorenzo Hall <joe@cdt.org> Sun, 26 June 2016 13:26 UTC
Return-Path: <jhall@cdt.org>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09C7512B055 for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 26 Jun 2016 06:26:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cdt.org
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jzGXsEXF7Kco for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 26 Jun 2016 06:26:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-vk0-x235.google.com (mail-vk0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c05::235]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 39E9F12B050 for <tls@ietf.org>; Sun, 26 Jun 2016 06:26:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-vk0-x235.google.com with SMTP id j2so203097393vkg.2 for <tls@ietf.org>; Sun, 26 Jun 2016 06:26:21 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cdt.org; s=google; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=A71b8HCN59ro4iGwytdhheMzV9j9J+DhUmjU0HN6ibQ=; b=U7Tn0Sc3T1CXT90UZOhAaeCVO9Hc+91aCMjF3ki3+yXPfbPChISiY+saAY0YP/gyD6 xxccvRNIxNmKelzcXq0I8UAQZ7YU/6CdNjnj35iN4n4vbrlhLDcOoFHGbCyah2ZlAgKv VoobJXNucAvLSEUgJ+HLlm2/18m5I75xSoJmk=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=A71b8HCN59ro4iGwytdhheMzV9j9J+DhUmjU0HN6ibQ=; b=Xa+0epwCU4mOqWhFVbDiabgd6Tn+wGOI2vjM2BgzsPdaPzYu1s0gS7175BwAWxEo0y xd4kq3X2TtWvmoOo6W8F37O+0J/k/s4M+X20k61o3NtdfrfOdKnPEe9SK7ob7HgnVIpx r3psaYK+zfNcuJXV5afc29qJ1EdGkS/4PACdE0L77OadyWceSqZbf25qd3FmsUKnXtAq VBjuRHATc/d94swVvrxR39W4tFSuqP1opzwT5WdOtWpmdUsCQ+t4ihUgyBSzl07fgYEG 418zCU29aFiWkjyLUcIy6cJ+ecuMLkaozndWR2iLlzh4Jg5IpmXUvO4sJDWnHP1QDRH+ 8MCw==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tIuQkpakzWFdv70931k6Zyp8UYwNKa++Gv5I5PUcvDxOWCj69UTkik+1dmKrFQI8BwL7xt2BNgjMC1Rkp17
X-Received: by 10.159.35.230 with SMTP id 93mr6540081uao.26.1466947580277; Sun, 26 Jun 2016 06:26:20 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.103.29.71 with HTTP; Sun, 26 Jun 2016 06:26:00 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <9A043F3CF02CD34C8E74AC1594475C73F4CB077A@uxcn10-5.UoA.auckland.ac.nz>
References: <9A043F3CF02CD34C8E74AC1594475C73F4CB077A@uxcn10-5.UoA.auckland.ac.nz>
From: Joseph Lorenzo Hall <joe@cdt.org>
Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2016 09:26:00 -0400
Message-ID: <CABtrr-WQqSVTHAOoXAKaPj62v9mJ8Fjd+uoKzqYzazGH4BbaVA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Peter Gutmann <pgut001@cs.auckland.ac.nz>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/sCU2F5CxWIQcad-8i8zJSFJGNgE>
Cc: "<tls@ietf.org>" <tls@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [TLS] Updated TLS-LTS draft posted
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2016 13:26:23 -0000
https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url1=draft-gutmann-tls-lts-03&url2=draft-gutmann-tls-lts-04 On Sun, Jun 26, 2016 at 9:13 AM, Peter Gutmann <pgut001@cs.auckland.ac.nz> wrote: > I've just posted the latest draft, as per Russ' comments and Hubert Kario's > suggestion this removes any mention of the term "profile" from the text, it's > now called an update. It also clarifies some issues that were encountered > during testing, for example what happens during a rehandshake and how > signalling of LTS vs. extended master secret and encrypt-then-MAC are handled. > > There's also an open question as to what should happen when a suite with e.g. > SHA-512 is negotiated. The LTS mandatory suites all use SHA-256, but it's > possible to negotiate a suite with SHA-512 while still using LTS. Presumably > this means the hash size will change to 64 bytes rather than 32. > > Finally, there's now a LTS test server available for interop testing, > temporarily using the next free extension value 26 until a value is > permanently assigned for LTS use, see the draft for details. > > Peter. > _______________________________________________ > TLS mailing list > TLS@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls -- Joseph Lorenzo Hall Chief Technologist, Center for Democracy & Technology [https://www.cdt.org] 1401 K ST NW STE 200, Washington DC 20005-3497 e: joe@cdt.org, p: 202.407.8825, pgp: https://josephhall.org/gpg-key Fingerprint: 3CA2 8D7B 9F6D DBD3 4B10 1607 5F86 6987 40A9 A871
- [TLS] Updated TLS-LTS draft posted Peter Gutmann
- Re: [TLS] Updated TLS-LTS draft posted Joseph Lorenzo Hall