IETF Logo Mail Archive

[TLS]Re: Trust Anchor Negotiation Surveillance Concerns and Risks

Mike Shaver <mike.shaver@gmail.com> Sat, 20 July 2024 13:11 UTC

Return-Path: <mike.shaver@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F262C14F68F for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 20 Jul 2024 06:11:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.107
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.107 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DVhZpTkRMuEb for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 20 Jul 2024 06:11:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-oo1-xc2d.google.com (mail-oo1-xc2d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::c2d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 20223C14F617 for <tls@ietf.org>; Sat, 20 Jul 2024 06:11:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-oo1-xc2d.google.com with SMTP id 006d021491bc7-5b9794dad09so1385341eaf.3 for <tls@ietf.org>; Sat, 20 Jul 2024 06:11:53 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1721481112; x=1722085912; darn=ietf.org; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=bkuRo6MO9kpx6/RetwEYqFlH7TELoeotbeyKyB+b3GI=; b=VHRg32NtDFMO8UqofXD0G/zGr+KlvIQ1dSjEY38S9T4TkgTv2+kjeWMqeS5yAqn8g7 Bh2RxqBPxEPvaxpGwXpcr6vslEno/Sd9ADWvHIic+G6Ggt6oGuN/yFGdJM6EtKLpnbWG GnPfeiX0zoM45Nam41iV0MlzH6PZCntCsR9zqFhqqeYX8QAJbbgs39nhSgx0xeo+uD0K iRxWMhNhchE9YOlSl/ADfakr3uhNwn4A4ecL18ZCealkLhPy2+22HoDImldS6OypHACh zxO+1vtI4oz86CF/o98t/NSI3XnZqR1qaQrEbRw/JAs4TPC1BzsO51uv3v2cIbeXD2Ci YzHQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1721481112; x=1722085912; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=bkuRo6MO9kpx6/RetwEYqFlH7TELoeotbeyKyB+b3GI=; b=v+CyiMIKOEgUI+1waCMGEgl/+MLJG4y+ntzKdF+NPgj5F97vi+ILDkN0IyeX7AdgwV BaHjI8dUgBRxU5erl/uONjpkNI8jJD6sph2kGstZWHKol7GUki+GeNooPqnNV/I54AG/ CIXiHZ/G18g31Q+t4kD0acrRmQ32YtHcjkUYmTOn3fPLVbo/jUjALOEcEmhiEFg6Y2LR mfLo+hx7BMm53Hnt8e64laAQzvpPQfGxQUd7S57CVBImKYl+qfQ1u0WJ+lMvpSWB4433 A6NlBkcEArVIDMmYwxgmoDrOHySIXQqL2KYMB730p3qZN6FkUY45HrIcHMAIASZKxQGm MKpA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yyg1Pj4nExhZfTMyLPJw8O9REb6Gaez83dL6sEWjnWKPHn05QNZ ++3wC2MMfDjmWdpalZnmWcnaHmkLmjqZMYVc/iFEt0zyWAV45jFIub7gElfNYxASnXOBJwfB2k1 H3DejJC98UE31MJr0PMlRoZM5WCW6U51z63w=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IFSGDfko4+HM0rnhHQ2OlKicJpTUeId4hQ/joxlKZaNo5CYNI2xDz9fUjZQ/EKaB1GAkT3cr7lC7vaTW4KCJaI=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6870:4584:b0:25d:f8fa:b538 with SMTP id 586e51a60fabf-261214ef3a3mr2245130fac.29.1721481112110; Sat, 20 Jul 2024 06:11:52 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAD2nvsT4qWqudiv1C1wZn6rB4_s-9EDENq5TXEbxr_ygcMFjDQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAChr6Sw+gxK3dO29F9bsLTQReJz6LzT2hZb5O7LAXmKzQbKTSw@mail.gmail.com> <CACf5n7_29CNXLf+SmpKKOWkc_3Oi2BZqZ8irU+z=3btJns_1-Q@mail.gmail.com> <CAChr6SxJ3r88a4Aehv_5fsSWb1JApV6Lg4hfwdm0Oh5x04_shQ@mail.gmail.com> <479BA457-9001-4EBC-A84F-9E3EB71E809F@akamai.com> <CACsn0cmhsh-zeJOaa7xy_2crxgvhAF=nK9FqWxxf1dB2SMhMyQ@mail.gmail.com> <Zpu0reBpH3dtFYdf@LK-Perkele-VII2.locald>
In-Reply-To: <Zpu0reBpH3dtFYdf@LK-Perkele-VII2.locald>
From: Mike Shaver <mike.shaver@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 20 Jul 2024 09:11:41 -0400
Message-ID: <CADQzZqtsj272Gt771Ef=VhS2+WvWKkct0Jx1=wmyS7kTu0ds1w@mail.gmail.com>
To: Ilari Liusvaara <ilariliusvaara@welho.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000002cce2d061dad8e7b"
Message-ID-Hash: MOQ7YZGBCVGGTE434RTYAMCMXQDGJMPP
X-Message-ID-Hash: MOQ7YZGBCVGGTE434RTYAMCMXQDGJMPP
X-MailFrom: mike.shaver@gmail.com
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-tls.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: TLS List <tls@ietf.org>
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc4
Precedence: list
Subject: [TLS]Re: Trust Anchor Negotiation Surveillance Concerns and Risks
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/sFKTs1NwqWk-jb0vNonZBFHO1Zw>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:tls-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:tls-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:tls-leave@ietf.org>

On Sat, Jul 20, 2024 at 8:59 AM Ilari Liusvaara <ilariliusvaara@welho.com>
wrote:

> Allowing various embedded and IoT stuff to migrate off of WebPKI would
> be of immense value. Such stuff using WebPKI has been source of gigantic
> amount of pain.


I agree with your second sentence very much, but I don’t understand your
first one. In what way are these non-web systems not allowed to use other
PKI models today? How would trust anchors provide that permission?

Mike

v2.37.1 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status