Re: [TLS] Confirming Consensus: Negotiating upper layer protocols

Yoav Nir <ynir@checkpoint.com> Fri, 08 February 2013 11:43 UTC

Return-Path: <ynir@checkpoint.com>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CBBC21F8887 for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 8 Feb 2013 03:43:14 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.52
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.52 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.079, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gTyIAcXt+l-x for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 8 Feb 2013 03:43:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp.checkpoint.com (smtp.checkpoint.com [194.29.34.68]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D614A21F8901 for <tls@ietf.org>; Fri, 8 Feb 2013 03:43:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: from DAG-EX10.ad.checkpoint.com ([194.29.34.150]) by smtp.checkpoint.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id r18Bh9iS021296; Fri, 8 Feb 2013 13:43:09 +0200
X-CheckPoint: {5114E0F9-0-1B221DC2-2FFFF}
Received: from IL-EX10.ad.checkpoint.com ([169.254.2.18]) by DAG-EX10.ad.checkpoint.com ([169.254.3.103]) with mapi id 14.02.0328.009; Fri, 8 Feb 2013 13:43:10 +0200
From: Yoav Nir <ynir@checkpoint.com>
To: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Thread-Topic: [TLS] Confirming Consensus: Negotiating upper layer protocols
Thread-Index: AQHOBYr9GL86wqFuI0yIDZn7ET3rH5hu6dMAgADMeoA=
Date: Fri, 08 Feb 2013 11:43:09 +0000
Message-ID: <4613980CFC78314ABFD7F85CC30277211199F41A@IL-EX10.ad.checkpoint.com>
References: <CABcZeBM4Sor1oHQ15KtH=K=B3OUxaDUpfgS7=oHLHWeQpPngsQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAL9PXLzdfDM-J_1W+iCf=z4ey+qC8yuh3etmYAETTsQNTd4YUQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAL9PXLzdfDM-J_1W+iCf=z4ey+qC8yuh3etmYAETTsQNTd4YUQ@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [172.31.20.6]
x-kse-antivirus-interceptor-info: scan successful
x-kse-antivirus-info: Clean
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <93271CAB0C38D04E80F239981AE52AD9@ad.checkpoint.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: "tls@ietf.org" <tls@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [TLS] Confirming Consensus: Negotiating upper layer protocols
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tls>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Feb 2013 11:43:14 -0000

On Feb 8, 2013, at 1:31 AM, Adam Langley <agl@google.com> wrote:

> On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 6:28 PM, Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com> wrote:
>> WG members, please provide any comments on whether we should
>> take this work on by February 21.
> 
> Unsurprisingly, perhaps, I support the WG taking this work on.

+1 (although I think we're not in agreement on which proposal should be selected)