Re: [TLS] Re-chartering TLS

"Christopher Wood" <caw@heapingbits.net> Fri, 17 January 2020 13:54 UTC

Return-Path: <caw@heapingbits.net>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF04C12006E for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 17 Jan 2020 05:54:58 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.698
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.698 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=heapingbits.net header.b=qgoG1vor; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b=FpVUGPbE
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1MlgGJdOcl6j for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 17 Jan 2020 05:54:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: from out2-smtp.messagingengine.com (out2-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.26]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DD888120074 for <TLS@ietf.org>; Fri, 17 Jan 2020 05:54:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: from compute6.internal (compute6.nyi.internal [10.202.2.46]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id F386821B6B; Fri, 17 Jan 2020 08:54:52 -0500 (EST)
Received: from imap4 ([10.202.2.54]) by compute6.internal (MEProxy); Fri, 17 Jan 2020 08:54:52 -0500
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=heapingbits.net; h=mime-version:message-id:in-reply-to:references:date:from:to :cc:subject:content-type; s=fm3; bh=bANIw8QHctIsAKugxkesUj//L8Jv OqKM1lEUlyHJNPc=; b=qgoG1vorsu5A1+zHfIiEI+uiRDJyesjXMbrPQtzUTooz P+l+52B2yYjkAWGaQvC+reVVxRJhCZe1eafw9VQoDPEsRxhPXIjjB8qGDNgK6DCM kGFIJ4xfGVxubOeAx068e5EtvWYa439mVnOnnPcXN5p+IKEZti1lU7JPvPS15Kis UItXV52pVPv6Utlc8PYmv9VMxmKsuaoeHMOUzNufxCFp/VXXvXZwgF7e0CiTVCxb PaobRFw0ta9O6VjREqlfalV7JzQ9mPvc5oh3cvxIwdWrTGknny71iHBq7B92P63Z fbcfU5R3VAfDUezETqb4bE4eeknREVCt9FFj0eRkmQ==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=bANIw8 QHctIsAKugxkesUj//L8JvOqKM1lEUlyHJNPc=; b=FpVUGPbEi/uVTm2Kp90YIN EItgGUf6CLpuWfryTGTX3lkgDBe3xsLc4vjzplY22RKgoecucgtLj995jlHU6v+f IV241JobpAK+BcrPwkZXUxGS/eIsDWqq5cIKezrK3FTwHwKtdLV0jL0FY+XkAHLQ wxCf46oZKVKuJ4dBjCu17ysUpXO9PWgwiwMNelc9nZMjGTd82Nky6w3IudCShy9p WyfryKCdqqaanN6hKsI8KBu92pOEbrjzX73FQkAlA/6hnxZqe63rNeH0ddZugT1m NWufBUnSjajCWTKO7BF8CZjtZc9hKcVpYSba2rrPrVLXlO7xfwQMXOFUT5p3/Svg ==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:rLwhXv4WrgQE8q_JQCJJzV-aCvXf6fmlMJdUyQ6w3pwvFLBXBQ-c-Q>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedugedrtdejgdehjecutefuodetggdotefrodftvf curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecu uegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenuc fjughrpefofgggkfgjfhffhffvufgtsehttdertderredtnecuhfhrohhmpedfvehhrhhi shhtohhphhgvrhcuhghoohgufdcuoegtrgifsehhvggrphhinhhgsghithhsrdhnvghtqe enucffohhmrghinhepihgvthhfrdhorhhgnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpegt rgifsehhvggrphhinhhgsghithhsrdhnvghtnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptd
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:rLwhXlW0ke7-JVCTsF7tmMrt_1MgpysOwTnqTnNgMH1Cyx9JNWFT0Q> <xmx:rLwhXnIicTkgP9bQXr8h1cFGVPb0oGnO5OTPajr74zFhO4hZzvKNKA> <xmx:rLwhXnv9AS8FF8ptZkazt8zGWz3G5qepkIbn8GMPgx93WhSyErWQEQ> <xmx:rLwhXmPDHXJI4MxH4vMWJE8uBmhEu82TLaJBZh6F9r-ZZYURvexhBw>
Received: by mailuser.nyi.internal (Postfix, from userid 501) id ABA5F3C00A1; Fri, 17 Jan 2020 08:54:52 -0500 (EST)
X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface
User-Agent: Cyrus-JMAP/3.1.7-754-g09d1619-fmstable-20200113v1
Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <d539da91-5426-4d95-9f12-b79948b09b95@www.fastmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CADqLbzKLc_by7n3LWXViVAnLU+Yad0GFtkQ4QyKiupWG8co7Jg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <0d5254f7-d51f-4519-95ed-29502c61fa2b@www.fastmail.com> <CADqLbzKLc_by7n3LWXViVAnLU+Yad0GFtkQ4QyKiupWG8co7Jg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2020 05:54:31 -0800
From: Christopher Wood <caw@heapingbits.net>
To: Dmitry Belyavsky <beldmit@gmail.com>
Cc: "TLS@ietf.org" <TLS@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/sWMxReUB0YzCyW30M86GN8ufl3Q>
Subject: Re: [TLS] Re-chartering TLS
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2020 13:54:59 -0000

On Thu, Jan 16, 2020, at 10:39 PM, Dmitry Belyavsky wrote:
> >  The working group aims to achieve three goals. First, improve the applicability and suitability of the TLS family of protocols for use in emerging protocols and use cases. This includes extensions or changes that help protocols better use TLS as an authenticated key exchange protocol, or extensions that help protocols better leverage TLS security properties, such as Exported Authenticators. Extensions that focus specifically on protocol extensibility are also in scope. This goal also includes protocol changes that reduce the size of TLS without affecting security. Extensions that help reduce TLS handshake size meet this criteria. 
> 
> I think it's worth replacing "the size" with "the resource consumption" 
> in the description of this goal. Otherwise, the tls-batch-signing draft 
> (https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-davidben-tls-batch-signing/) 
> may be left out of the scope of the charter.

Good suggestion -- thanks!

Best,
Chris