[TLS] Alissa Cooper's No Objection on draft-ietf-tls-sni-encryption-05: (with COMMENT)

[Alissa Cooper via Datatracker <[e-mail]>]

Alissa Cooper has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-tls-sni-encryption-05: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-tls-sni-encryption/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Section 1:

s/servers rely on the Service Name Information (SNI) TLS extension/servers rely
on the Server Name Indication (SNI) TLS extension [RFC 6066]/

Section 2.1:

Why is parental controls in quotes?

Section 2.2:

s/Encrypting the SNI now will complete this push/Encrypting the SNI completes
this push/

(for timelessness)

Section 2.3:

In the first paragraph I would suggest trying to use the present tense more so
that this still makes sense far in the future.

s/At the moment/At the time of this writing/