Re: [TLS] comments on draft-subcerts

Nick Sullivan <nick@cloudflare.com> Thu, 20 August 2020 02:32 UTC

Return-Path: <nick@cloudflare.com>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58A473A1069 for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 19 Aug 2020 19:32:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cloudflare.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WdslqS7iLNHZ for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 19 Aug 2020 19:32:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ua1-x92e.google.com (mail-ua1-x92e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::92e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BC97C3A1068 for <tls@ietf.org>; Wed, 19 Aug 2020 19:32:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ua1-x92e.google.com with SMTP id x17so139219uao.5 for <tls@ietf.org>; Wed, 19 Aug 2020 19:32:39 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cloudflare.com; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=wVTX5Upe3pZjd5rSe0odprpBLXGNJt8PqHV9X/PDlfw=; b=gK9lx6fZlyHnqDrMhR68R3QGvIh/Ia0N+hdD6xBWaAQBowh3ycJJm3s/a77mo7sIl9 pw/1usryWNNItor94aDZrXFPQRddv2qxdmOHVc6v/cVqtMSq0gBIqcdAM14oZlLw00xp Jdat22c5Fpp93onbt37mMuAsyUJTl2PlUZuDU=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=wVTX5Upe3pZjd5rSe0odprpBLXGNJt8PqHV9X/PDlfw=; b=lavADZNzN76HxWh2vN4MCAkM2pAU8p8j1fmoEhIsIOW3LYQ1RB+dLoOXBmtUHZt1MW oh7S/OUjAeQXbid9Nn5jk2LikZ6FnZpw0PIQs7TzRyKSDf0xLLjfNYwm8OJrurXXCuh9 TEhrREtOyKJO+kjmiauDbURf833a6Axq52gNd3cBTa7MNoRi1ty/j30qeR/88W0SrS8o Lrc1lZ3qbSPKNg7BI5QPnlCB8U/Jrz0nSPQHZGROwXqMrVR+iv62mvojVFlWkqFeJ7Ij S0Ue0W6LVMVa9069hfdeNNbfX5bxkxUo3GacnV0UVc0admbIEEu0CGdKT6/eFkff43Y8 tcpw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531tdjYbuY8MJhooXA4mSHBVnuslnHbuTp9XWHcH5IRU4AyL47Db aGhTExK49+hQjKpdbcKa6XhHCuZ5HMJvs8C102LCzT7H1Eci54Bq
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwz+AlQ/jn3Rzgw9WtU7C9sMpLyAh7EVgDRTQaeYN+T40rp/j1Io/f0Lhe8PbI+FJiuK2TaLRcgvpWKSVzQzvE=
X-Received: by 2002:ab0:7153:: with SMTP id k19mr354397uao.55.1597890757850; Wed, 19 Aug 2020 19:32:37 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <A2E098AE-6ACE-4999-ADF2-5C1211E70CCB@akamai.com> <FC3B9E6E-7F14-4585-97F0-845A049AD001@vigilsec.com>
In-Reply-To: <FC3B9E6E-7F14-4585-97F0-845A049AD001@vigilsec.com>
From: Nick Sullivan <nick@cloudflare.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2020 19:32:21 -0700
Message-ID: <CAFDDyk8xNp7YbSJSNhNuxcbf7r8XFt_Lds8XnW7X63pqEVNgyA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
Cc: IETF TLS <tls@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000031bcc05ad45efe6"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/szsy6UQKIv5OnEALYVOHZijTmRU>
Subject: Re: [TLS] comments on draft-subcerts
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2020 02:32:41 -0000

Thank you Russ and Rich for your comments,

I've attempted to address the comments here:
https://github.com/tlswg/tls-subcerts/pull/80, save for the one about the
example extension.

Russ, which format do you think would be most useful for the extension? I'm
having a hard time finding another extension to model this after.

On Fri, Aug 14, 2020 at 10:00 AM Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> wrote:

> I have two comments:
>
> 1) The OID assignment for the ASN.1 module was assigned already by IANA.
> Please fill it in.
>
> 2) I think it would be very helpful to have an example of the extension in
> an Appendix.  There was discussion on the list about it, and an error was
> found in the proposed example, which proves the need for an example.
>
> Russ
>
> _______________________________________________
> TLS mailing list
> TLS@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
>