[TLS] WG adoption of draft-sandj-tls-iana-registry-updates-01

Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie> Sat, 22 October 2016 14:30 UTC

Return-Path: <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 705131295DA for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 22 Oct 2016 07:30:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.732
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.732 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.431, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cs.tcd.ie
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bi_9McKDFSva for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 22 Oct 2016 07:30:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mercury.scss.tcd.ie (mercury.scss.tcd.ie []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6F7961294EE for <tls@ietf.org>; Sat, 22 Oct 2016 07:30:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by mercury.scss.tcd.ie (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CB29BE4C for <tls@ietf.org>; Sat, 22 Oct 2016 15:30:10 +0100 (IST)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at scss.tcd.ie
Received: from mercury.scss.tcd.ie ([]) by localhost (mercury.scss.tcd.ie []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WWOY2zibT8fX for <tls@ietf.org>; Sat, 22 Oct 2016 15:30:09 +0100 (IST)
Received: from [] (95-45-153-252-dynamic.agg2.phb.bdt-fng.eircom.net []) by mercury.scss.tcd.ie (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9BABEBE49 for <tls@ietf.org>; Sat, 22 Oct 2016 15:30:08 +0100 (IST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cs.tcd.ie; s=mail; t=1477146609; bh=ozXHEB9CkFdz7gUyCtdQ8tIgjjs4O5n4PI5FLmiqgaU=; h=To:From:Subject:Date:From; b=4LvfZK8/1G4DnsXZFZ1uWPJdijRzSwmeK/ZK0pQwlXDAqJeM0BSf6mS6pW1c8LqRr 6S7vJ2KsQ8QuO87uBHM+e4eB7LEUOTXcN16fOrH0Agm9+qFX3xSEDGP2pMKlflwOxr mTVZu06W/sfBgxLfTM2x48BScMFuq/3f82mdodXA=
To: "tls@ietf.org" <tls@ietf.org>
From: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
Openpgp: id=D66EA7906F0B897FB2E97D582F3C8736805F8DA2; url=
Message-ID: <26941608-3cb4-2625-cd07-f2a1953fc394@cs.tcd.ie>
Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2016 15:30:08 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg="sha-256"; boundary="------------ms020602070608080304090200"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/tU0-aNY2XyXHgFKIUXaHjG00uxg>
Subject: [TLS] WG adoption of draft-sandj-tls-iana-registry-updates-01
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2016 14:30:13 -0000

Hi all,

Sean and Joe wrote up this IANA registry draft as per
discussions at WG meetings and on the list. As they've
done the initial work, but are WG chairs, they wanted
me (as responsible AD) to call consensus for it. (They
wrote this up as finding authors for such fairly boring
stuff was hard - thank them for taking one for us all
when you see 'em:-)

Based on the earlier discussions and limited mails on
this draft, I do think there's consensus to adopt this
approach and that the text in the I-D [1] is a good
enough starting point for the WG.

If you think otherwise, please comment to the list in
the next week.

If you've questions about all this from a process-crap
POV, feel free to ask those on or off the list as you
think appropriate;-)

Note that if this is adopted as a WG item, the chairs
might decide to continue as editors or recruit someone
else. In the former case, I'm fine with doing the WGLC
stuff when this is ready (which it nearly is IMO, so
there may or may not be a need for new authors, depends
on what the WG think of the text I'd guess).


[1] https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-sandj-tls-iana-registry-updates-01