Return-Path: X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DA5C1B303D for ; Tue, 15 Sep 2015 18:43:21 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.999 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RIL2f2dupqNo for ; Tue, 15 Sep 2015 18:43:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-vk0-x230.google.com (mail-vk0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c05::230]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E87961B3020 for ; Tue, 15 Sep 2015 18:43:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: by vkao3 with SMTP id o3so79717380vka.2 for ; Tue, 15 Sep 2015 18:43:19 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=Psda8sO/Ag8fBkWvrTAxDUhDfFJYkf5Fo0HnCVT511w=; b=YAD7IfvcxKnYDRgvvr5q6rZtnLHiFXsfhU7xOiYWceLOg3ezpuG4u3e+6L4Obqr/GY tygsJGMG2pHU/RuoYVLErht0kxLdfu6Ki8IJ0Kv33JrBf3MSwOzM8Du2nPUwX1e5YNbc Rz2SMR7ZoykW/F4r0zgwuhyrg04TE2eXOSpdJwDWMERUk9CSUrarj8TEKiv2HxQnMyIk DbOIS4qzR5duSDz7iVUFz/UUMQEwk90LpJ0+2p2II93MYjr/ncCGnysj45/lu1S/DdDv Flz/q54tJJtQLpby7CVTqR+XgJvxPBDDo6VzNknv5uucobhM2kPEiOHgeZVfHwvJ5nTF ecCw== X-Received: by 10.31.180.130 with SMTP id d124mr25342727vkf.120.1442367799041; Tue, 15 Sep 2015 18:43:19 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.103.18.65 with HTTP; Tue, 15 Sep 2015 18:42:59 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Tony Arcieri Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2015 18:42:59 -0700 Message-ID: To: Joseph Salowey Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a114388344c25ad051fd36c3e Archived-At: Cc: "tls@ietf.org" Subject: Re: [TLS] Call for consensus to remove anonymous DH X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2015 01:43:21 -0000 --001a114388344c25ad051fd36c3e Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 +1 for removing anonymous DH On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 6:00 PM, Joseph Salowey wrote: > There has been some discussion to remove anonymous DH as described in > https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tls/current/msg17481.html. I think > ekr's message sums up the pros and cons well. I don't think we have > consensus on this issue yet. Please respond on this message by Monday, > September 21, if you have an opinion. > > Thanks, > > J&S > > _______________________________________________ > TLS mailing list > TLS@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls > > -- Tony Arcieri --001a114388344c25ad051fd36c3e Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
+1 for removing anonymous DH

On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 6:00 PM, Joseph S= alowey <joe@salowey.net> wrote:
There has been some dis= cussion to remove anonymous DH as described in=C2=A0https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tls/curre= nt/msg17481.html.=C2=A0 I think ekr'= s message sums up the pros and cons well.=C2=A0 I don't think we have c= onsensus on this issue yet.=C2=A0 Please respond on this message by Monday,= September 21, if you have an opinion. =C2=A0

Thanks,

J&S

_______________________________________________
TLS mailing list
TLS@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls




--
Tony Arcieri
--001a114388344c25ad051fd36c3e--