Re: [TLS] TLS@IETF99 - Additional Session Added and Agenda Bash!

Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> Fri, 14 July 2017 17:11 UTC

Return-Path: <mellon@fugue.com>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58E5F129B53 for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 14 Jul 2017 10:11:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5TfUe11ptmFC for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 14 Jul 2017 10:11:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pg0-x22a.google.com (mail-pg0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c05::22a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7165B1270A0 for <tls@ietf.org>; Fri, 14 Jul 2017 10:11:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pg0-x22a.google.com with SMTP id k14so48681406pgr.0 for <tls@ietf.org>; Fri, 14 Jul 2017 10:11:28 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=W1yvz6PnP++DntTLvfsUX/X5f7LpBYCeZaUmO2Z9slo=; b=KrsMjfX5X3WtFdXsr3i0gQ9bL8cL9DQm+p6+L5UjIpZ6oURGRmTmIp/DCFV1I9HD7r t9PmMjeQdzpE31zvz+Apw54TMsoKhWlMEKm2fjMU4QAWHXj6SGO7H3upiio757Df0+TR 9CkVBnN7Xs+AqCU/xQ1J5pjvfLzmtw8ZNaZXqgHbu1L0uJkSjSxvFJwaUkwFz7wjonsj 9sD228cM6chLncuSrYCX3C6ry3rfNzI8qGMDkWUkTTnDF3qp+LWcZQ2KJMIdiXAyWzN9 cGsj84A+jM+FKJ6YhYsX6Z3XNurmyUd4unTA3VoB99jGVfbNIQPBAz0gmiQJLe1VA0zw mFFg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=W1yvz6PnP++DntTLvfsUX/X5f7LpBYCeZaUmO2Z9slo=; b=b2OZGZ4vcVb01FLn59lGDik4QqihvdNLxStNuHb94bQKQM+CpVWL7pPc8K2Sa/pRR3 EipaRap12PyuZrB5Fs063Hvn4iH7coKpFeVhwkDe2QfXelGEiuAq2SpWIBmZsPvAfQIl hE0zOKFf2s68ez8yEQYPc0R7V1o27K/TjwOtR9Huv0brFzR7NmciNDEkqcj1YLtGWYgg t8YeKVj7aSNcLFE+97Np56jB9WMo+oI4DIfk8FKyTnQlsM25tXrP9yxJx/V7MJDpOhMa CO13RlrpdFdPgkZ965ooYPH9nYYw8cCDa8+WPlyvOBF2pV69pQWFBaZwdNL31HZ4sNX8 09VA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AIVw110A5MD068vSJFCX0v5E6RRxSEwnWB8kSAjhq3g9eS9jidzuQpBX RmeRcn8AFYONEKsDeeTJ0Bw31kwhlVLF
X-Received: by 10.99.105.4 with SMTP id e4mr16262679pgc.228.1500052288029; Fri, 14 Jul 2017 10:11:28 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.100.181.42 with HTTP; Fri, 14 Jul 2017 10:10:47 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <E9F707C8-E1A5-4BC4-9D96-8B604DA41A31@ll.mit.edu>
References: <7603A43F-62F7-486C-B2A7-48DD56231814@sn3rd.com> <b405b2c3-aee5-8d93-c86b-8172461e68b7@cs.tcd.ie> <E9F707C8-E1A5-4BC4-9D96-8B604DA41A31@ll.mit.edu>
From: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2017 19:10:47 +0200
Message-ID: <CAPt1N1nRoa=zoYB3VQuYZuj2Usrz+M4HUkK4C5PP7fL=hsoEaA@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Blumenthal, Uri - 0553 - MITLL" <uri@ll.mit.edu>
Cc: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>, "<tls@ietf.org>" <tls@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="94eb2c140dcec5d9a505544a23d1"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/toyfBPqXFwJ4SiV5Li8X_mi_3is>
Subject: Re: [TLS] TLS@IETF99 - Additional Session Added and Agenda Bash!
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2017 17:11:37 -0000

I have two working groups already in the monday slot.   I doubt I'm unique
in this.   It seems like you should put the important business in the slot
that was previously scheduled, and the overflow into the Monday slot.
It's hard to imagine how a discussion of the wiretapping thing could be
anything other than a dance at the mic, full of sound and fury, signifying
nothing.

On Fri, Jul 14, 2017 at 5:13 PM, Blumenthal, Uri - 0553 - MITLL <
uri@ll.mit.edu> wrote:

> +1
>
> Current agenda does look backwards. IMHO, do as Stephen suggested.
>
> Regards,
> Uri
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> > On Jul 14, 2017, at 11:10, Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
> wrote:
> >
> >
> > Hiya,
> >
> >> On 14/07/17 15:51, Sean Turner wrote:
> >> Please let us know your thoughts.
> >
> > 80 minutes for wiretapping is too much. Zero would
> > be better. But if not...
> >
> > I'd suggest: 10 minutes for draft-green, 10 minutes
> > to describe issues with that (i.e. the slot for which
> > I continue to ask) and then 10 minutes discussion. If
> > we assume the folks in the room have read the list and
> > the draft that should be plenty.
> >
> > If we assume they haven't read the list, then it's more
> > important that the counter-arguments be given sufficient
> > time.
> >
> > So your draft agenda seems to get that backwards to me,
> > in that it allocates 40 minutes for a sales-pitch and
> > then 40 minutes where we bitch about that at the mic
> > interspersed with proponents repeating bits of the sales
> > pitch. That might be more amusing for us all, but seems
> > like a worse use of time to me.
> >
> > Cheers,
> > S.
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > TLS mailing list
> > TLS@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
>
> _______________________________________________
> TLS mailing list
> TLS@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
>
>