Re: [TLS] WGLC for "Deprecating TLSv1.0 and TLSv1.1"

Töma Gavrichenkov <ximaera@gmail.com> Fri, 26 April 2019 15:14 UTC

Return-Path: <ximaera@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59BD2120438 for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 26 Apr 2019 08:14:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zO06ser_loZV for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 26 Apr 2019 08:14:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-yb1-xb2b.google.com (mail-yb1-xb2b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::b2b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 40268120432 for <tls@ietf.org>; Fri, 26 Apr 2019 08:14:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-yb1-xb2b.google.com with SMTP id x71so1377087ybe.6 for <tls@ietf.org>; Fri, 26 Apr 2019 08:14:35 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=PnnEcpMCeNv3fpcCJFR9Hgj+S0Dyt4WdPg/WeIxxlzE=; b=gLxaLVSkK53FPcvuT2sWx+VlxGyl2GH4Xg+PEpBgUG+aUSaHMxuqVyktBFI1KCNa65 KAjE0TYJMngIkRSAvWAMCoufcslySFyKM3jAs3NWXwMHsWNguLYzYvz/xBQ08nnlXov3 tyAEbgkEpVnJXBpAjz56TBQkpZo1EQ/AhLQcjOMY1JPY4zgpwiWAn3O2/bWyeG54MZCk fKNzMgke/8vsHm9uc4loJ5LKMgW1Aney61wfCRWwQHpOGvnuzuwGUgAZNUugWNm/fb1P kG2NKfEKxveg0QL7d3ZGhRdRcEheYN90Y71dzQIQEDGIE9PEcJo8095H0yd7tq/250pd l8kA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=PnnEcpMCeNv3fpcCJFR9Hgj+S0Dyt4WdPg/WeIxxlzE=; b=jC5B2mEY/jIbp+u3CVW0PuxfV9HaM8x1VBhO2EjpnCdJo2HCfpOQpulQ5c0saFDhtw 2e7PukbtkwBO3dCC5DBIBxqxEnP0M2fgut9EILimUYVXnUUWDKnJqrhQ2Evjz//iytzt vhM8OaROghk95gB7ZTRgcUfB1zcTBny0qQBHxRXFO03Ndpp5uHtXzRy9Xfw+pKqnuwej 7BdoxsYIXqRcve1EQqVDrkdsSZhsTNEXJvXNoi7JDLKfeGYdEgpdG+dIroZAxtJGDRIA LTT5W2cxmc/Kfmue/Z9NK2n5204ACqRWe9VlcE3N4dws4kntsVp58sRb/ODwsJvGNDF4 oEuw==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXdZv5+U3kS/X5fNPUn6DXsfg+k5fvU5jVmEsNxd2Z1pXbiFsrS ColMp37Q19E5MfPu3AIvezHUYJBCowetb6SdOwo=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyTCYhjiE/i9txP65Ar2atz+nC8EEzZPmO1qs4g4Gicgr9bR+PvdlLZa0G8C8Xxx2OIVYw4/15R03v5TTSllyo=
X-Received: by 2002:a25:814e:: with SMTP id j14mr37820435ybm.482.1556291674009; Fri, 26 Apr 2019 08:14:34 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <28511b10-8f6a-4394-95a9-5188130f7b58@www.fastmail.com> <2EF7433E-DB94-497F-80D7-2A060097261B@dukhovni.org> <50206934.V7594Szvhb@pintsize.usersys.redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <50206934.V7594Szvhb@pintsize.usersys.redhat.com>
From: =?UTF-8?Q?T=C3=B6ma_Gavrichenkov?= <ximaera@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2019 18:14:21 +0300
Message-ID: <CALZ3u+Y5WGtWPwJstNaUD=2L-FGwJq4wgX4G3ftq_NqaYyPbmg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Hubert Kario <hkario@redhat.com>
Cc: "<tls@ietf.org>" <tls@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000065768e058770648f"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/tqsrCOFycIkMTI5thkr4gsAuWX0>
Subject: Re: [TLS] WGLC for "Deprecating TLSv1.0 and TLSv1.1"
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2019 15:14:37 -0000

Peace,

On Fri, Apr 26, 2019, 6:08 PM Hubert Kario <hkario@redhat.com> wrote:

> I think it's fine as it is. This use case is very specific and the impact
> for
> it is limited. So yes, I think that the delay between publishing and now
> will
> change the situation even more out of favour of TLS 1.0.
>

Exactly my thought: polishing it further would hardly make the document
significantly better, taking in the account the delay necessary to do that.

--
Töma

>