Return-Path: <pgut001@cs.auckland.ac.nz>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1])
 by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C7121B4080
 for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 16 Sep 2015 07:59:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.071
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.071 tagged_above=-999 required=5
 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1,
 FRT_PROFILE2=1.981, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44])
 by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id 3bg-w5AvRuOL for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>;
 Wed, 16 Sep 2015 07:59:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx4.auckland.ac.nz (mx4.auckland.ac.nz [130.216.125.248])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8C3A21B4086
 for <tls@ietf.org>; Wed, 16 Sep 2015 07:59:34 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple;
 d=auckland.ac.nz; i=@auckland.ac.nz; q=dns/txt; s=mail;
 t=1442415576; x=1473951576;
 h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references:
 in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version;
 bh=Ig8RsvFfAaGUpmfoFgHlBFPt/7X3UkxegmsSpaE22mw=;
 b=34tBGp+k7HkJ/dtLt7FKcC9lwFoDCbwF9M3Nfal+fGRg3b27tkMcLynV
 7J/geLVjtflaMpi4XrAVGcFDzmUc0Uy5/sK1Y71ALtR+F12qWjRUFEuIB
 WwUNPNUfVpljeGA94CVPPShoPI3PU+8twE2QlUiYYcFnMrCQ5yMFSdQbV
 pm/RLYPR9rkx6te4Pyy4JU7UXVfA26/5HjBt0Qfspk3/j82czBZN1FR22
 xvQT75WEiuJ5LiP6uiWVGRLAMvbPlDYa45va0gp7doLV6+SdtIagtRwHo
 wLuOIQbGWLXB9sftn31QMZL6co5B86xQt8RFqCWeuW677ffLRtWl7FT+1 g==;
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.17,539,1437393600"; d="scan'208";a="41946801"
X-Ironport-HAT: MAIL-SERVERS - $RELAYED
X-Ironport-Source: 130.216.4.171 - Outgoing - Outgoing
Received: from exchangemx.uoa.auckland.ac.nz (HELO
 uxchange10-fe4.UoA.auckland.ac.nz) ([130.216.4.171])
 by mx4-int.auckland.ac.nz with ESMTP/TLS/AES128-SHA; 17 Sep 2015 02:59:34 +1200
Received: from UXCN10-TDC05.UoA.auckland.ac.nz ([169.254.9.47]) by
 uxchange10-fe4.UoA.auckland.ac.nz ([169.254.109.63]) with mapi id
 14.03.0174.001; Thu, 17 Sep 2015 02:59:32 +1200
From: Peter Gutmann <pgut001@cs.auckland.ac.nz>
To: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>, "noloader@gmail.com"
 <noloader@gmail.com>, Tony Arcieri <bascule@gmail.com>
Thread-Topic: [TLS] TLS Provfiles (Was: Call for consensus to remove
 anonymous DH)
Thread-Index: AQHQ8FFq13KcVZ89fEGkcyYs2GLTPZ4+0CRR//8+EACAAPO8Y///cIqAgADNSLw=
Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2015 14:59:32 +0000
Message-ID: <9A043F3CF02CD34C8E74AC1594475C73F4B08823@uxcn10-tdc05.UoA.auckland.ac.nz>
References: <CAH8yC8=eHzQPL6cROVK4Pm0V2FSYTL7C7csLG7p49W5LEmfo=Q@mail.gmail.com>
 <9A043F3CF02CD34C8E74AC1594475C73F4B070E6@uxcn10-tdc05.UoA.auckland.ac.nz>
 <55F92C1A.9060703@cs.tcd.ie>
 <9A043F3CF02CD34C8E74AC1594475C73F4B0723C@uxcn10-tdc05.UoA.auckland.ac.nz>,
 <55F98037.6050103@cs.tcd.ie>
In-Reply-To: <55F98037.6050103@cs.tcd.ie>
Accept-Language: en-NZ, en-GB, en-US
Content-Language: en-NZ
X-MS-Has-Attach: 
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: 
x-originating-ip: [130.216.158.4]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/u6LUNa-3-MnlnVRKcDBkzK5EE_k>
Cc: "tls@ietf.org" <tls@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [TLS] TLS Provfiles (Was: Call for consensus to remove
 anonymous DH)
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working
 group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>,
 <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>,
 <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2015 14:59:44 -0000

Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie> writes:=0A=
=0A=
>I'm not sure how to process that comment. You ask for X, I ask is Y=3D=3DX=
 and=0A=
>your answer is that Y doesn't exist? Seems odd. ;-)=0A=
=0A=
There's a difference between "X/Y exists" (but no-one knows about it) and "=
X/Y=0A=
exists and is actively used".  As I said, I've never seen the BCP quoted,=
=0A=
cited, or referenced in any third-party standard that deals with TLS (and b=
y=0A=
third-party standard I don't mean other RFCs but industry standards like IE=
C=0A=
61850 or IEC 62351).=0A=
=0A=
>Feel free to collect a bunch of your own emails (hand-wringing or not:-) a=
nd=0A=
>shoot those out as an I-D.=0A=
=0A=
That makes it worse, not better, because it's just creating one more I-D or=
=0A=
RFC or BCP or whatever to languish in obscurity.  The profiles need to be p=
art=0A=
of the TLS spec where they'll be noticed and used by other standards=0A=
referencing it.=0A=
=0A=
Peter.=0A=

