Re: [TLS] possible new work item: not breaking TLS

[Stephen Farrell <[e-mail]>]

Hiya,

Thanks to the chairs for allocating some agenda time for
discussion of this topic at tomorrow's session. I plan to
more or less present [1] instead of using slides, so if
folks have a chance to read it over before we get to that
agenda item tomorrow that should help speed things up a
bit.

I'm still happy to take corrections, comments and suggestions
however folks would like to provide those but plan to be at
the social event tonight so likely won't do more updates to
the text before tomorrow morning (semi-inebriated additions
being a bad plan, even if nowhere near as bad a plan as
draft-green:-)

Cheers,
S.

[1] https://github.com/sftcd/tinfoil

On 13/07/17 13:00, Stephen Farrell wrote:
> 
> Hi again TLS WG chairs,
> 
> I've done a bit more work on the collection of arguments
> against the latest break-TLS proposal. [1] I plan to keep
> working on that so more input is welcome. (Corrections
> where I've gotten stuff wrong are even more welcome.)
> 
> I'd like to again request some time on the agenda to
> allow discussion of those points in a more structured
> manner than will be possible during the mic-line scrum
> that'll likely follow a sales-pitch for draft-green.
> 
> I'd also like to ask the WG if we think it'd be useful
> to document the arguments against that and other "let's
> break-tls" proposals we've seen in the past in an RFC.
> If people think it would be useful, I'd be willing to
> do work to edit such a draft, or help edit that.
> 
> Thanks,
> S.
> 
> [1] https://github.com/sftcd/tinfoil
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> TLS mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
>