IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [TLS] draft-ietf-tls-esni feedback

Rob Sayre <sayrer@gmail.com> Tue, 22 October 2019 18:29 UTC

Return-Path: <sayrer@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 604F61208FA for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 22 Oct 2019 11:29:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.997
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.997 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id i6gVO_nT4gEu for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 22 Oct 2019 11:29:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-io1-xd35.google.com (mail-io1-xd35.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::d35]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C22E012020A for <tls@ietf.org>; Tue, 22 Oct 2019 11:29:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-io1-xd35.google.com with SMTP id w12so21632841iol.11 for <tls@ietf.org>; Tue, 22 Oct 2019 11:29:07 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=HnLnEYROZEayFt27p3Afaztkt+3E8wr3gnRi6rzSadQ=; b=hPQ4CBYLlwSSlxCj4fDMXu5HSvZLeVcVFoOr1HcZBEIveK/ytwqgTcIEMR+lSbdgxm qTXeSFNmDFzGVPI7Rc2/YfZK+wjB4cOa8Z4Dde8qrAZwm8qSdg7BVVbxq18Nu6tLX8M8 VjuIGzGX3x8kjR457uGLOOYmicH+RaV1i60DcpRA+6eyATgplFDQlzSZmOYaWNg/AYPw Yez1lK50w9KL3nkNVn7+zSK/yeixdAP0Wt62ytpb9w+n8QMvMtLbpeJw233f3o3gMBlo TMxzHyX/IRyFmtecQKb4wRoDc00xVSohjM0kPNnm4EoiFtV0mHigTIvvKV6tfsA4dJ3b hpBg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=HnLnEYROZEayFt27p3Afaztkt+3E8wr3gnRi6rzSadQ=; b=KKZ9C5et9WM7LPUnbiBYgcYI/WBohxAA/lIGtuiRYmBb1yhp0G33T3DpYAfXgxzVcX fWVsij/SUl3UOxc3yF+H57eTNbG6mfs3sZx+D4A186n1vUw8ogtOGE24JSWtjMLFowXy N45E8NR6LLQhyTUTu8tlrIulLT/6rMmd2iSXkxqCdiU0Vwq34FVNJpYFr0JMAk5Z/DLl 71O6uJWhXN2pGM+B0U1IMH+FZ1zCXj7lQEm7DNajYfeBlCidMFSZvEZd6MjxKVe9SCzQ 9J/5WBfkkB38+ChlaQ5SKYUkNughLxs8HjrhiAIwY5X60tWON4DjdUVfJrEvJTVUfw2L pLJw==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWWO0oa/XtqVGDuMgcA8CWn6vDR2Xivyw70UzBIT+Esc5F0lv3D N17X6xF2e411wUPK6vhWsAnbeK2Ewbk2ygxl/qk=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqw3ENiafEYfab5tsMNSjg+TYFXihO5AQfpsxvz4LT/So8KyHfqWub5HgJ+o+W31T2Lo9GsYlJfjBWhXz+D/sAk=
X-Received: by 2002:a02:c646:: with SMTP id k6mr5273760jan.53.1571768946854; Tue, 22 Oct 2019 11:29:06 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAChr6Sw3f7du3JYxfcWSZje1zjDzsRBQyDjob-AvzjWeZzKW7g@mail.gmail.com> <CAChr6SxWE66jPRbnBRtwNSn3L+uNFkoFBbYNOBAkKDN05qotoA@mail.gmail.com> <CABcZeBOy8ogJrmFajxX1pqjqgnE61gE=c3CWz+pp34NWHmGKbw@mail.gmail.com> <03e15760-dfce-cd7b-baea-56ac70d92192@cs.tcd.ie> <CAChr6SzmpSn3Q8tBi+Pdc+Bq7stiukbufbh-jDt+AEtrkV8XGg@mail.gmail.com> <f87c2916-d03d-2715-7b36-7b70fead8df4@cs.tcd.ie> <CAChr6SxfT0ed5J89siGX23A0G77BJQWxFRDoJ1w0v7=5O0KERw@mail.gmail.com> <8063bb12-8462-53fa-fa62-1e5abb1a652e@cs.tcd.ie> <CAHbrMsBPJqzaUSa42gGq45MfsTvCVW7t95q3feWEiSYeSN9ocw@mail.gmail.com> <333fde42-76f9-1af3-0f0f-c70914b0222e@cs.tcd.ie> <CAHbrMsA0PFwvu3hvZgXMbe2Buzq9dQHgNJJLOqtyMUzb-qpc0A@mail.gmail.com> <04a5a50a-3268-d9fb-de16-abb9224409ed@cs.tcd.ie> <CAChr6SySVXsH1J7KGDJjjB=wdxhdaCe207pLn2fGFMmDb1q82w@mail.gmail.com> <BE5E7283-6EF4-4113-ADBA-7790A5DFACD8@akamai.com> <e20daa2c-b239-11e0-87e7-beaebb80aebf@cs.tcd.ie> <CABcZeBMHnz7t6QhXVu8BfXmA1Q4RU1x06TOpcyqFY2FZJmenGQ@mail.gmail.com> <120231f6-698c-03c0-824e-0077b85b6439@cs.tcd.ie> <CABcZeBML9=9cdA4MV+3tu3_2Tmx4bB5dNPR=DhcZYc-GSmsJnw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CABcZeBML9=9cdA4MV+3tu3_2Tmx4bB5dNPR=DhcZYc-GSmsJnw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Rob Sayre <sayrer@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2019 11:28:55 -0700
Message-ID: <CAChr6SwB8Y9dX2tPu9bkmMF+qHswCkDYwk620ZqiZrFa670+aA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>
Cc: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com>, Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>, "TLS@ietf.org" <tls@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000bf10e3059583f920"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/uMVTD8KixNwEY2DLGTVRQUu5tgs>
Subject: Re: [TLS] draft-ietf-tls-esni feedback
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2019 18:29:14 -0000

On Tue, Oct 22, 2019 at 11:24 AM Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com> wrote:

>
>
> On Tue, Oct 22, 2019 at 11:15 AM Stephen Farrell <
> stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On 22/10/2019 19:10, Eric Rescorla wrote:
>> > Uh,why?
>>
>> Openness, transparency, enabling the WG to make decisions on
>> the list.
>
>
> The WG has the chance to make decisions on the list *in response to*
> proposals in the draft. At this stage of the draft development, I don't
> think it's problematic for authors to put proposals in a draft with the
> understanding that they are proposals. Eventually...
>

This seems fine to me, fwiw. It was a little weird to hear about the
decision in this way, but that kind of thing is always happening behind the
scenes. :)

It seems to me that the client is in the best position to set the padding,
so I’m not sure why there is anything in the DNS record.

thanks,
Rob

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email