IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [TLS] consensus call: changing cTLS and ECH to standards track

"Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com> Sat, 23 May 2020 20:31 UTC

Return-Path: <rsalz@akamai.com>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0136B3A0E98 for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 23 May 2020 13:31:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=akamai.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id eTb-wk5VKJXs for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 23 May 2020 13:31:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx0a-00190b01.pphosted.com (mx0a-00190b01.pphosted.com [IPv6:2620:100:9001:583::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B08CA3A0DB8 for <tls@ietf.org>; Sat, 23 May 2020 13:31:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pps.filterd (m0122333.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-00190b01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 04NKSYlF014208; Sat, 23 May 2020 21:31:18 +0100
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=akamai.com; h=from : to : cc : subject : date : message-id : references : in-reply-to : content-type : mime-version; s=jan2016.eng; bh=c/nK8D5Xk5ZiHY9pUwUhpqks8J04qxczz4N+chDxs0A=; b=Lj7vNybBUpuN9pvr5HLPSgtaBVf7m47k4kpM3cKRwIG1TJKfMAvmsvUS59Gm77BALmW4 /nFE2LfYDhmOBgtMdY9JelRwuQwJAn6FU8HWHNd7byE1/NKWhX/OTvgdScAigcTWHqai RXJB+i6JjYDd/jepz1HxIcbbSj6FSh9IIXonm3JzQiolw/2edCZYWpyQZbWEJDoNK2nq uX6hhd5g62vMxEis2ZLQJIe5gLaQ3fO0mpH+YCRBBSZBaOgi/DtyDPt+qRMkh7O8eI2S OgJw93KL85GjuC6VyMR7nfBWoPmOnjp+6r30Rz6Q/PrQvTi2C2MvrXZrLhnQsABwMdhS gQ==
Received: from prod-mail-ppoint4 (a72-247-45-32.deploy.static.akamaitechnologies.com [72.247.45.32] (may be forged)) by mx0a-00190b01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 316u3aht1b-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Sat, 23 May 2020 21:31:18 +0100
Received: from pps.filterd (prod-mail-ppoint4.akamai.com [127.0.0.1]) by prod-mail-ppoint4.akamai.com (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id 04NKHDHW014709; Sat, 23 May 2020 16:31:17 -0400
Received: from email.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.165.115]) by prod-mail-ppoint4.akamai.com with ESMTP id 316y5ut2eq-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Sat, 23 May 2020 16:31:17 -0400
Received: from USTX2EX-DAG1MB1.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.165.119) by ustx2ex-dag1mb1.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.165.119) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2; Sat, 23 May 2020 15:31:16 -0500
Received: from USTX2EX-DAG1MB1.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.165.119]) by ustx2ex-dag1mb1.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.165.119]) with mapi id 15.00.1497.006; Sat, 23 May 2020 15:31:16 -0500
From: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com>
To: Hannes Tschofenig <Hannes.Tschofenig@arm.com>, Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>
CC: TLS List <tls@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [TLS] consensus call: changing cTLS and ECH to standards track
Thread-Index: AQHWL95BhO30YC2zgEGiRtzf7oKk66i0KG6AgABFEACAATgpAIAAjZaA
Date: Sat, 23 May 2020 20:31:16 +0000
Message-ID: <C0EA3225-DA94-45CA-981D-E99172EFF693@akamai.com>
References: <FB85C39F-D4B5-42BC-B28B-B3D3E8CEFB58@sn3rd.com> <450FE9F7-56B4-4824-A791-01B22B641800@akamai.com> <CABcZeBPLiisrxzqc4t2CouzcPg1pz7D5w6kgsNTO7TRjpTrX1A@mail.gmail.com> <AM0PR08MB3716AE635DE41621CADDBBEAFAB50@AM0PR08MB3716.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <AM0PR08MB3716AE635DE41621CADDBBEAFAB50@AM0PR08MB3716.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/16.37.20051002
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [172.19.33.133]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_C0EA3225DA9445CA981DE99172EFF693akamaicom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.216, 18.0.676 definitions=2020-05-23_12:2020-05-22, 2020-05-23 signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 suspectscore=0 malwarescore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 mlxscore=0 mlxlogscore=642 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-2004280000 definitions=main-2005230171
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.216, 18.0.676 definitions=2020-05-23_12:2020-05-22, 2020-05-23 signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 cotscore=-2147483648 phishscore=0 malwarescore=0 mlxlogscore=622 adultscore=0 suspectscore=0 clxscore=1011 priorityscore=1501 impostorscore=0 mlxscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2004280000 definitions=main-2005230172
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/uRw0qWyWCo69AKWvBSENINRs8h0>
Subject: Re: [TLS] consensus call: changing cTLS and ECH to standards track
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 23 May 2020 20:31:23 -0000

FWIW, I’m less skeptical of standards-track for cTLS, but still not sure.  ARM and mBedTLS are important.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email