Re: [TLS] 4492 ECDH_anon

Yoav Nir <ynir.ietf@gmail.com> Wed, 22 July 2015 17:12 UTC

Return-Path: <ynir.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70B701B2BA4 for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 22 Jul 2015 10:12:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ANSNqd4tb0w0 for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 22 Jul 2015 10:12:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wi0-x22e.google.com (mail-wi0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c05::22e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DBF071A8711 for <tls@ietf.org>; Wed, 22 Jul 2015 10:12:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by wicgb10 with SMTP id gb10so107606415wic.1 for <tls@ietf.org>; Wed, 22 Jul 2015 10:12:48 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=jEesyB2/PVJcz2QW3TwG4QU5MXZbdbz+taQQC00n1PA=; b=CcjxPP5RpDgf3UDHvybDczggG3VBb9m17E62njP0KayZJFusfgxDRtAbOFF9LIKTvP nZX/LbnPEg8Ox1Y6wkvjmefmq9HAu23OUzZvbTensnuUooW9CxexEY3PNEZwHpK4P7CP q2EklFTv7pDDNOuacxdYrhxgjreYyD7Vodr+ZGUiXyzZlVNRkelfw2jNPpR/mDoPJEPk K6HaxG2R9qyXs6B5Trcj3xttqKgPPSWZRiNWwE/9Dx92OXemHgqOi8I0I4G9SFbdkcPN v9d1K3cz9a8/ciDMclBTDf+7FeP5UX8rtEKHCbkXe7TTD95wKNOMIAYXFaZVutuq7ygo eb6Q==
X-Received: by 10.180.24.198 with SMTP id w6mr7909702wif.49.1437585168669; Wed, 22 Jul 2015 10:12:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?IPv6:2001:67c:370:176:c57a:9f1a:f0fb:dbd5? ([2001:67c:370:176:c57a:9f1a:f0fb:dbd5]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id x5sm4295874wif.21.2015.07.22.10.12.47 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Wed, 22 Jul 2015 10:12:47 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2102\))
From: Yoav Nir <ynir.ietf@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CABkgnnWgysMuTXvZx6DSP0X5OxP8Xfne_7o2LN2zZq8vQFJ-Vg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2015 19:12:45 +0200
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <67B411CE-E6DD-4BC4-BEE5-1513C5C3D0AE@gmail.com>
References: <CABkgnnV3b76rr=v2GVkcrFdJGomb_Yg91zU7yZLOXp5-onfLRA@mail.gmail.com> <E3B69C38-A84C-447C-BD0B-35CE69504854@gmail.com> <CABkgnnXEVw1X=uN1kzbVUZRSOZZ+Ow19czgM+fY+tSbLiDuSAQ@mail.gmail.com> <201507221307.10279.davemgarrett@gmail.com> <CABkgnnWgysMuTXvZx6DSP0X5OxP8Xfne_7o2LN2zZq8vQFJ-Vg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2102)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/uUlYWVPOS6vcnBKPBFBHo_J4Y14>
Cc: "tls@ietf.org" <tls@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [TLS] 4492 ECDH_anon
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2015 17:12:51 -0000

I’d like to hear from the chairs if it’s OK to rename stuff in the IANA registry.

That has some implications for implementations that use these names.

Not to mention that the same issue applies to DH(E)_anon

> On Jul 22, 2015, at 7:09 PM, Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> On 22 July 2015 at 19:07, Dave Garrett <davemgarrett@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Could the cipher suite names be officially changed to add the 'E' to them? It'd make things simpler to be consistent.
> 
> I'd be OK with that.  I didn't do it in the PR, but would be happy to
> make a new one.