Re: [TLS] On Curve25519 and other possibilities (e.g. ietf256p, ietf384p, ietf521p,

Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org> Fri, 27 June 2014 08:38 UTC

Return-Path: <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 818D41B2F33 for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 27 Jun 2014 01:38:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.347
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.347 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HELO_MISMATCH_COM=0.553] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UNvHQBxRhpFr for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 27 Jun 2014 01:38:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from hoffman.proper.com (IPv6.Hoffman.Proper.COM [IPv6:2605:8e00:100:41::81]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C799B1A0215 for <tls@ietf.org>; Fri, 27 Jun 2014 01:38:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.32.64.173] (31-221-87-78.cust-31.exponential-e.net [31.221.87.78] (may be forged)) (authenticated bits=0) by hoffman.proper.com (8.14.8/8.14.7) with ESMTP id s5R8conQ086693 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for <tls@ietf.org>; Fri, 27 Jun 2014 01:38:54 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from paul.hoffman@vpnc.org)
X-Authentication-Warning: hoffman.proper.com: Host 31-221-87-78.cust-31.exponential-e.net [31.221.87.78] (may be forged) claimed to be [10.32.64.173]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.2\))
From: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
In-Reply-To: <53AC97B8.2080909@nthpermutation.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2014 09:38:49 +0100
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <186372F4-EEBF-4EE8-A617-A7503EC1FBB6@vpnc.org>
References: <53AC97B8.2080909@nthpermutation.com>
To: "tls@ietf.org" <tls@ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.2)
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/uWgWTY4lHlrgQ8SZK7FhK6th0ps
Subject: Re: [TLS] On Curve25519 and other possibilities (e.g. ietf256p, ietf384p, ietf521p,
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2014 08:38:56 -0000

-1

On Jun 26, 2014, at 10:59 PM, Michael StJohns <msj@nthpermutation.com> wrote:

> There's been a small but vocal minority

The fairly strong support for other curves from the CFRG to refutes this statement.

--Paul Hoffman