IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [TLS] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5288 (4694)

Aaron Zauner <azet@azet.org> Tue, 14 June 2016 09:04 UTC

Return-Path: <azet@azet.org>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D07C812D135 for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 14 Jun 2016 02:04:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=azet.org
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cuaDbQWzcahZ for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 14 Jun 2016 02:04:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pf0-x22a.google.com (mail-pf0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c00::22a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 93CCF12D12F for <tls@ietf.org>; Tue, 14 Jun 2016 02:04:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pf0-x22a.google.com with SMTP id t190so55500101pfb.3 for <tls@ietf.org>; Tue, 14 Jun 2016 02:04:32 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=azet.org; s=gmail; h=subject:mime-version:from:in-reply-to:date:cc:message-id:references :to; bh=xrQwMCl8p6PTXVWwTQtQoo55dljWDwG+eP5PbZxUKYE=; b=ZXUtpEXWawft6BPbkheijCQikeywAzuLA36260MO9iujoBDyPQvOFEGVA+zlDilY+Z zJ0Aj6QJdi/Sqivfb+yPpZKrI17707pu+Aua8+/0RhKyVYVk6uelVHOurEXaER/YCkqM ZvmJG/jhRpHMxWTvmfxKQEdYxqf/yJKbPBQuA=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:mime-version:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :message-id:references:to; bh=xrQwMCl8p6PTXVWwTQtQoo55dljWDwG+eP5PbZxUKYE=; b=FmE7Bzp/VBSc40HufgLEkHRvWM7Wq9H7af+Bipf+i2GI7yqWusi1+whym2X9Y1r6ut T4GLAYaLLJD7oMdIzI/QzaNuLnY8WlqVrHWFJRIi31dwuZNZTr+xlzvJpRAKSHCTmWRD eM4PnPFAxt5yS5tvg0lgcXG12fn3Mc3X4gu0GxPBUBiuqfQc7sc7N44ASJ/X8AzTWxOe 5tD/ve0jN7FDPrURHjtDUV0uVl2s250E0644Mc9B/TJp6bvBvcyfoQBjYP/OugApwgNK Uk9oxfzY8J2s31DEXIn8prPZHmqOTKRTDpFmdex2Htb0cP4Ca7eb7zyCOsPvMgNA80nZ 4csw==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tKA9G5BZBZYlLNMQhRwH82FOz5pspda05CRydAGOWldab8j9LbVzT7y+SUfa3ygPg==
X-Received: by 10.98.46.70 with SMTP id u67mr2552836pfu.134.1465895071184; Tue, 14 Jun 2016 02:04:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.234] ([114.121.233.60]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id ym9sm13888403pac.25.2016.06.14.02.04.27 (version=TLS1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 14 Jun 2016 02:04:29 -0700 (PDT)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.2 \(3112\))
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_92E49AB3-04BF-4B63-B2CB-EC2D4575F2A9"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha512"
X-Pgp-Agent: GPGMail 2.6b2
From: Aaron Zauner <azet@azet.org>
In-Reply-To: <96CBAD0F-0F0A-4095-81FD-09EE804EB7F6@azet.org>
Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2016 17:04:22 +0800
Message-Id: <1367F829-067E-4449-AB53-5357945BA9B1@azet.org>
References: <20160514082717.7997D180004@rfc-editor.org> <9A043F3CF02CD34C8E74AC1594475C73F4C80CD0@uxcn10-5.UoA.auckland.ac.nz> <CAN8NK9EaDQ-Pugi2j=3KcXrn5G-8mcXVs4O2HGCkH7h7GSKbbA@mail.gmail.com> <9A043F3CF02CD34C8E74AC1594475C73F4C80F76@uxcn10-5.UoA.auckland.ac.nz> <CAN8NK9Gn9iK72dBq3opQ2E_HEZyVB+ysCqo5JxMH8vHhy4gEEg@mail.gmail.com> <9A043F3CF02CD34C8E74AC1594475C73F4C817BE@uxcn10-5.UoA.auckland.ac.nz> <a05f1e9d02a96721479a0de75e335cc4@esat.kuleuven.be> <A1FEF4A5-AC64-4832-904A-47768E5D5AF9@gmail.com> <54302B87-4730-4B8E-9F55-B33B89425A51@azet.org> <D35F4D97.6C5B2%kenny.paterson@rhul.ac.uk> <53384A13-5F80-4CF0-BD8F-F68E304ADF15@azet.org> <D35F5460.6C5D0%kenny.paterson@rhul.ac.uk> <3B2C6D5A-939E-4539-B902-D4502EB9739C@azet.org> <96CBAD0F-0F0A-4095-81FD-09EE804EB7F6@azet.org>
To: "tls@ietf.org" <tls@ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3112)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/ug84L3S0oUZnAOS5GWhsBp8D7A0>
Cc: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Subject: Re: [TLS] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5288 (4694)
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2016 09:04:34 -0000

Hi,

It's been a few weeks. We by now know of at least one other affected vendor. I think this errata is valid and should be accepted. I'll take any feedback and improvements if valid.

Aaron

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email