IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [TLS] Updated TLS Cached Info Document

Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie> Thu, 12 May 2016 14:40 UTC

Return-Path: <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E084C12B046 for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 12 May 2016 07:40:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.297
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.297 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.996, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cs.tcd.ie
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id q_GJB5DaCcFf for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 12 May 2016 07:40:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mercury.scss.tcd.ie (mercury.scss.tcd.ie [134.226.56.6]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6B8BE12B022 for <tls@ietf.org>; Thu, 12 May 2016 07:40:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mercury.scss.tcd.ie (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA081BE32; Thu, 12 May 2016 15:40:40 +0100 (IST)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at scss.tcd.ie
Received: from mercury.scss.tcd.ie ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mercury.scss.tcd.ie [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id sHrA7rPcusGf; Thu, 12 May 2016 15:40:39 +0100 (IST)
Received: from [172.20.10.8] (mb62436d0.tmodns.net [208.54.36.182]) by mercury.scss.tcd.ie (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A2CCEBE29; Thu, 12 May 2016 15:40:38 +0100 (IST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cs.tcd.ie; s=mail; t=1463064039; bh=gTdI64XJCxtUxbIoLhG4uSp7+sFXDXr9r0cyMZ4Ua4Y=; h=Subject:To:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=jjIpULB82QapwgjLQLRdwlDA2pNjVqkM6duVdh71YemPMt8dFc1PkgAbfBRstj7rO DK3/Jk3xm12hzZwPwdm8HogXNR/D9iIcRYRBEtLab/DKQ8gKJzjJ9J7YLx+Sdt3Ntz e4ZeYJ/VIx8bC5Mli2/JTVmK2KeR16/0EHJ2oabM=
To: Hannes Tschofenig <hannes.tschofenig@gmx.net>, "<tls@ietf.org>" <tls@ietf.org>
References: <57337AEA.2020202@gmx.net>
From: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
Openpgp: id=D66EA7906F0B897FB2E97D582F3C8736805F8DA2; url=
Message-ID: <573495E3.1060500@cs.tcd.ie>
Date: Thu, 12 May 2016 15:40:35 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.7.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <57337AEA.2020202@gmx.net>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha256"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="i0pSvEIjKqlit3cleedraXbjABEXStGa3"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/us5Uht45y_qbWrwSZvGkyPZHlRQ>
Subject: Re: [TLS] Updated TLS Cached Info Document
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 May 2016 14:40:45 -0000

Thanks Hannes.

This document was already approved by the IESG and we were
just waiting on this particular change to be made. AFAIK,
this change, while affecting the bits on the wire, is ok
with those who care about this document so I don't propose
to put it back through IETF LC or IESG approval unless
someone really thinks that's needed.

So I'll send the approval message in a day or two and get
this sent to the RFC editor if nobody yells.

Cheers,
S.

On 11/05/16 19:33, Hannes Tschofenig wrote:
> Hi all
> 
> I have just posted an updated version of the TLS Cached Info document
> reflecting the discussions from the last IETF meeting (and the feedback
> received from Karthik before) regarding the size of the fingerprint. The
> fingerprint is not truncated anymore, which reflects what we had in an
> earlier version of the document.
> 
> Here is the document:
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-tls-cached-info-23
> 
> Ciao
> Hannes
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> TLS mailing list
> TLS@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email