[TLS] Mike Bishop's No Objection on draft-ietf-tls-hybrid-design-15: (with COMMENT)

[Mike Bishop via Datatracker <[e-mail]>]

Mike Bishop has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-tls-hybrid-design-15: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ 
for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-tls-hybrid-design/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

This is a solid and well-written document. Thank you.

In Section 1, it says "Some authors prefer...." It might be useful to be clear
which authors are being referenced here -- authors of this RFC? Authors of
referenced research papers? Authors of future hybrid specifications?

I appreciate the appendix of related work. You specifically call out one
reference as "an overview of post-quantum cryptography as of 2009," which
invites the question of why this is the best reference 16 years later. I would
either drop the date (if it's still the best overview around) or add a few
words stating that while dated, it remains a valuable resource because of [foo].