Re: [TLS] TLS@IETF101 Agenda Posted

"Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com> Tue, 13 March 2018 16:05 UTC

Return-Path: <rsalz@akamai.com>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F9C3124217 for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 13 Mar 2018 09:05:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=akamai.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id iVIZ5OY5iJR5 for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 13 Mar 2018 09:05:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx0b-00190b01.pphosted.com (mx0b-00190b01.pphosted.com [IPv6:2620:100:9005:57f::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 06B1F120047 for <tls@ietf.org>; Tue, 13 Mar 2018 09:05:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pps.filterd (m0050102.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by m0050102.ppops.net-00190b01. (8.16.0.22/8.16.0.22) with SMTP id w2DG5o5Z017254; Tue, 13 Mar 2018 16:05:50 GMT
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=akamai.com; h=from : to : cc : subject : date : message-id : references : in-reply-to : content-type : mime-version; s=jan2016.eng; bh=Nrg2xXO75Q9+1uHu4oLS0jiH9H8mLuNqNEkKsCSyYEg=; b=UpaWCceGQ06Y5evlr9QqCBGFNxYMnKNXwMa61FPrpoyLmY1iJYrb9md5z8Y71aymQWEj Rx8ouqjWP4GbudA2/1Mg6N29uR0RLmpCi2TYwz/5jVgdHF0SHrN0peUjB2CvFafhO2qi 6LMFoDAP4pPxToUm6iop6WpKVncx6WAUjfPIlXu9Pma18GvZzRNsn4VlXSkapWQhz677 Ben04TJJnN9TcRWmBTZVArRA5i3Ovh944wbsAQ/njGb7ORsVvxsTFBhp7VNXjgy3P6fD e88KmjeQVIB27hii9vNS+Ii91yUvlSsrBhgpzDXcYvLs7IXy0Yridvkm+Bktbw7+I4Tw 6A==
Received: from prod-mail-ppoint1 (prod-mail-ppoint1.akamai.com [184.51.33.18]) by m0050102.ppops.net-00190b01. with ESMTP id 2gm5ags5y1-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 13 Mar 2018 16:05:50 +0000
Received: from pps.filterd (prod-mail-ppoint1.akamai.com [127.0.0.1]) by prod-mail-ppoint1.akamai.com (8.16.0.21/8.16.0.21) with SMTP id w2DG1C2j001464; Tue, 13 Mar 2018 12:05:49 -0400
Received: from email.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.123.34]) by prod-mail-ppoint1.akamai.com with ESMTP id 2gmbjyjf8y-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 13 Mar 2018 12:05:49 -0400
Received: from USMA1EX-DAG1MB1.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.123.101) by usma1ex-dag1mb1.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.123.101) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1263.5; Tue, 13 Mar 2018 12:05:49 -0400
Received: from USMA1EX-DAG1MB1.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.123.101]) by usma1ex-dag1mb1.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.123.101]) with mapi id 15.00.1263.000; Tue, 13 Mar 2018 12:05:49 -0400
From: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com>
To: nalini elkins <nalini.elkins@e-dco.com>, =?utf-8?B?Q29sbSBNYWNDw6FydGhhaWdo?= <colm@allcosts.net>
CC: "<tls@ietf.org>" <tls@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [TLS] TLS@IETF101 Agenda Posted
Thread-Index: AQHTtvl2jdjB7/0TLECBbBkkzUJLO6PG6bYAgABgygCAAXVYgIAACUMAgACBwICAAEcAAIAE8GYAgAAMrwCAAA5/gP//vtmA
Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2018 16:05:48 +0000
Message-ID: <3F8142DE-EADB-4AB9-A204-7D87ACDCD3E3@akamai.com>
References: <6140B7A6-A1C7-44BC-9C65-9BE0D5E1B580@sn3rd.com> <986797a7-81b0-7874-5f39-afe83c86635b@cs.tcd.ie> <CAOgPGoBYc7O+qmjM-ptkRkE6mRsOYgc5O7Wu9pm3drFp3TVa6Q@mail.gmail.com> <d7dfdc1a-2c96-fd88-df1b-3167fe0f804b@cs.tcd.ie> <CAHbuEH7E8MhFcMt2GSngSrGxN=6bU6LD49foPC-mdoUZboH_0Q@mail.gmail.com> <1a024320-c674-6f75-ccc4-d27b75e3d017@nomountain.net> <2ed0gc.p5dcxd.31eoyz-qmf@mercury.scss.tcd.ie> <d7ec110f-2a0b-cf97-94a3-eeb5594d8c24@cs.tcd.ie> <CAAF6GDcaG7nousyQ6wotEg4dW8PFuXi=riH2702eZZn2fwfLQw@mail.gmail.com> <CAPsNn2XCNtqZaQM6Bg8uoMZRJE+qQakEwvw8Cn9fBm-5H+Xn_A@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAPsNn2XCNtqZaQM6Bg8uoMZRJE+qQakEwvw8Cn9fBm-5H+Xn_A@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/10.a.0.180210
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [172.19.33.179]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_3F8142DEEADB4AB9A2047D87ACDCD3E3akamaicom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:, , definitions=2018-03-13_07:, , signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 suspectscore=0 malwarescore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 mlxscore=0 mlxlogscore=852 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1711220000 definitions=main-1803130187
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:, , definitions=2018-03-13_07:, , signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1011 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=787 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1711220000 definitions=main-1803130187
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/vZznGUBvMNhTABzupAe12DU4Lfs>
Subject: Re: [TLS] TLS@IETF101 Agenda Posted
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2018 16:05:58 -0000

  *   Prague where half of the room hummed that an internal solution is needed.

No, this is not accurate.

Half the room hummed *to continue discussion.*  The discussion could still end with no action.