Re: [TLS] ESNI/ECH: minor progress, much githubbery

Rob Sayre <sayrer@gmail.com> Tue, 29 September 2020 02:58 UTC

Return-Path: <sayrer@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C3563A0C53 for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 28 Sep 2020 19:58:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GameERakrVdJ for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 28 Sep 2020 19:58:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-il1-x133.google.com (mail-il1-x133.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D9A893A0C3C for <tls@ietf.org>; Mon, 28 Sep 2020 19:58:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-il1-x133.google.com with SMTP id v13so1248083ilc.7 for <tls@ietf.org>; Mon, 28 Sep 2020 19:58:33 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=fMGikXvqm10v6mV/SToW9zkRBlc7zimVzibRwY+4TwU=; b=q+JVxi+is9UUtAIAfI0/uumVIPrBLFNCRN3Nqn0gsZ+cWJpgSjlyZ/QXRZVTXTxb8Q CD5fVxZQa0i7JIvO/MOwnkv0n7ocxmPxWV+ANhj+xEVgRFAYZ4WM1XxigTpO5ma2oEks IHAxx00vXBTIrINCUae/rji4lDrAaN+O50Mkr1+wGVEdbSjK6QHz0lbAvaGnNdmyI6HS q5zNWO2GhbASlawz67ND5yJ6OtYHqDMQ9WBX+L6FpgwPcrtFShaGfMoG5a02SuOmYOvE 2Up3/Ln1P90i8XAOfCjOpWOUIiLaNSAbwePnqp42+QIRkQrhGynZ5sCkUgc3cZ+e/lmB bG1Q==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=fMGikXvqm10v6mV/SToW9zkRBlc7zimVzibRwY+4TwU=; b=uZUheFi5rjsZCBRgB67g7qOmYbl/hAfQlewUve9CW4IraJZSsA7FHgjLIKkNKfwLBw cyBsFdVYyrSM66TedSIYZUDE1LJiTqQlN6AZ4Fp7s9q7CPVpxVvUjYy669CrIYuNQ0P+ u7s8/J0UiNBvKvxOptwQYbPKLxBaghd1l00CyeLQ49hn21oezFsXAy/A+EVjGWL0CDMT 0oCO9t27K+LT/huG+imZ2EtDiHU6J3Xiwa16r3XnwjaXjdLXHoHvrOdSeVNAPmPYgUac veEvRpGQF8z9Y1jOmLsgTDLqy4Xw2aiFibXEaKUwQgMuIHxQofMhq3tJRe5eIYY3hzil RWYQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532cfy4AWE+GiOqoPI6o9Fxk0EN0LQXrS/n4tfXK2eDZc6nLhfIe z1/ju2sQ40Vw9CDOSYQolAagoAAkuBUODvc3hiwj/Z1kFSg=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxqaZZzrMzzrsCwwoAhUod6LXhM9uf2bkeGT4+YhcNAxJiZTInlnVaD7OqytKswHd18UWMRGnjbSomGIcT2RPg=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6e02:1207:: with SMTP id a7mr1263652ilq.257.1601348312933; Mon, 28 Sep 2020 19:58:32 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <72d35b92-ea36-b6b7-5e35-ba528ba5faf7@cs.tcd.ie>
In-Reply-To: <72d35b92-ea36-b6b7-5e35-ba528ba5faf7@cs.tcd.ie>
From: Rob Sayre <sayrer@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2020 19:58:20 -0700
Message-ID: <CAChr6SyObv29gzofL4yL29nNXxVGR5xZcafK0oTz9qnAQ2Yf6Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
Cc: "tls@ietf.org" <tls@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000005aa94805b06af59d"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/vcvU6Euop2wXrlP1uAjfdrm7nLc>
Subject: Re: [TLS] ESNI/ECH: minor progress, much githubbery
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2020 02:58:36 -0000

On Mon, Sep 28, 2020 at 12:55 PM Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
wrote:

>
> Hiya,
>
> Today I read over the diff between the latest ESNI/ECH
> version and draft-07. [1] I have the following comments:
>
> 1. The volume of discussion on github is a deterrent. (*)
>

I agree the churn has seemed surprisingly heavy. The changes look
well-meaning, but I don't really see a plan.

Are there OpenSSL / NSS / etc implementations others can work from?
Probably the best way to lock this in and ship is to write the code.

thanks,
Rob