[TLS] Early codepoint allocation for tls_flags
David Benjamin <davidben@chromium.org> Wed, 11 September 2024 17:36 UTC
Return-Path: <davidben@google.com>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0E8AC14F69C for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 11 Sep 2024 10:36:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -9.403
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.403 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.148, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_SPF_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=chromium.org
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id t5u2zEQaGAOO for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 11 Sep 2024 10:36:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ed1-x52e.google.com (mail-ed1-x52e.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::52e]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3E27BC14F686 for <tls@ietf.org>; Wed, 11 Sep 2024 10:36:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ed1-x52e.google.com with SMTP id 4fb4d7f45d1cf-5c26815e174so52886a12.0 for <tls@ietf.org>; Wed, 11 Sep 2024 10:36:24 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=chromium.org; s=google; t=1726076182; x=1726680982; darn=ietf.org; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:mime-version:from:to:cc:subject :date:message-id:reply-to; bh=CwGcm6trXkC6w6SQbyxqvBTeHlR4X6/GyBLkMjvnlmQ=; b=GlkxcfecBjB+JLah3DJWPopTil0jzRZtgZvSbcgYfqN8ImOy0eDcezkOGlhpwK9ARV +UabCicEDjPC8OOVsSmIpk/VRM/oRmL+GFu9wNW2oktA4UwBcdnfrbjTwV7iCPur8Wjy +mAH6a6WNWvMXk8Acxjcc0RXpYdK8xCrTuj/k=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1726076182; x=1726680982; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:mime-version:x-gm-message-state :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=CwGcm6trXkC6w6SQbyxqvBTeHlR4X6/GyBLkMjvnlmQ=; b=XcbPk+KESPgJxNtuBpY8SSIN2Pbs6aXkWweokoD9H2pUKNQUQZIhTMGDSrsxerNYL1 Cy+CvV4YrNRMTUC8X2e32kqMWf2NLnGsF6c6rI8DQi6cZYPS0ntA8XvbPiw7dYX9ehTY XV0msepOo19ublDjQJX6oNUAFn8SXb+mQ7BtRnWD4Cr4PI5hzdh44TTpPMsUDG2jwqzf dthD0Ep1nwxQQ4uoO0wchy2oRnHR/MZ8Ct4O6Z5sFvGRK65zL4kVx5lenx8csVzDJ4R+ nF0z8rIo6nORJeigEuMeX6uKu7kzefZArS/U3KUpfc7/jPrBX6hh5bQaWRVhgK56LQCx tTMw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YyoxkDtX4jUNCMBu7MdETotJZS2MxjOkzjNKSbX4+F+U5hidO40 gcpEWAjKCLvf4gC2H1MZF+63r7sAyCM9LOWXn/+x2CQpLAks7kUCpAa2HFyQadrmm6oQWB1iv2E /vKopyJxaTCAILDGMGgx418HUIyQikNh3oKMrtAcFbGydMwOY5m0=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IFUVY4/WBQsm1VSz3TTG0RCaU8eKjD5DxIpWoFyjfs69n3wfizGmVSKzh8eYwU3nx3yO8vvIgQm2AD4afNnZD0=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:13ce:b0:5c4:1325:70a7 with SMTP id 4fb4d7f45d1cf-5c413cbc0d5mr276206a12.0.1726076181526; Wed, 11 Sep 2024 10:36:21 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: David Benjamin <davidben@chromium.org>
Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2024 13:36:05 -0400
Message-ID: <CAF8qwaDayL7HfQG2uxjFCD_D8ok1+N+1sviPWkrSQm5XhbZj=Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: "<tls@ietf.org>" <tls@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000a87ad30621db6de3"
Message-ID-Hash: 23RQH6SAPDQCEZKXKGQF7VI7NPS6KC43
X-Message-ID-Hash: 23RQH6SAPDQCEZKXKGQF7VI7NPS6KC43
X-MailFrom: davidben@google.com
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-tls.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc4
Precedence: list
Subject: [TLS] Early codepoint allocation for tls_flags
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/vefGvZrVai5OVW__u0kb1Pept00>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:tls-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:tls-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:tls-leave@ietf.org>
Hi all, It was suggested that sending this more broadly might be helpful. I'm looking to implement draft-ietf-tls-cross-sni-resumption, which depends on draft-ietf-tls-tlsflags. Both WG drafts in the data tracker appear to be in "Waiting for Implementation" state. Looking back in the list, it seems they both completed WGLC in August 2021 However, they are not currently implementable because we do not have a codepoint for tls_flags, so we have a bit of a deadlock. I think we should break this deadlock, and get an early codepoint allocation, so we can progress those drafts. Looks like this previously came up in February 2022, so I guess it slipped through. :-) https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/jLn0oGfae1sAFtLadYcMHW4nfcQ/ David
- [TLS] Early codepoint allocation for tls_flags David Benjamin
- [TLS] Re: Early codepoint allocation for tls_flags Watson Ladd