Re: [TLS] Status of X.509v3 TLS Feature Extension?

Rob Stradling <rob.stradling@comodo.com> Mon, 28 April 2014 14:06 UTC

Return-Path: <rob.stradling@comodo.com>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88F881A0A23 for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 28 Apr 2014 07:06:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.29
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.29 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HELO_MISMATCH_NET=0.611, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gbP7A6fJONZ1 for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 28 Apr 2014 07:06:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ian.brad.office.comodo.net (eth5.brad-fw.brad.office.ccanet.co.uk [178.255.87.226]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0EDE1A0A20 for <tls@ietf.org>; Mon, 28 Apr 2014 07:06:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 30381 invoked by uid 1000); 28 Apr 2014 14:06:10 -0000
Received: from nigel.brad.office.comodo.net (HELO [192.168.0.58]) (192.168.0.58) (smtp-auth username rob, mechanism plain) by ian.brad.office.comodo.net (qpsmtpd/0.40) with (AES128-SHA encrypted) ESMTPSA; Mon, 28 Apr 2014 15:06:10 +0100
Message-ID: <535E6052.90605@comodo.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2014 15:06:10 +0100
From: Rob Stradling <rob.stradling@comodo.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com>
References: <CA+aixj_i8XF2buDNMOp2=_Z0XzT3R4uGfxJtjoGt-_PButSggw@mail.gmail.com> <CA+cU71=FtZfzGktLhLz_j99mQ=LVbd0kzz0ZyGbewQUS0ouEGA@mail.gmail.com> <535E353A.9030008@comodo.com> <2A0EFB9C05D0164E98F19BB0AF3708C7120C61F536@USMBX1.msg.corp.akamai.com>
In-Reply-To: <2A0EFB9C05D0164E98F19BB0AF3708C7120C61F536@USMBX1.msg.corp.akamai.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/vpK0FdDgtokx6alpjg-Vk_Qhbas
Cc: "tls@ietf.org" <tls@ietf.org>, Phillip Hallam-Baker <philliph@comodo.com>
Subject: Re: [TLS] Status of X.509v3 TLS Feature Extension?
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2014 14:06:16 -0000

On 28/04/14 14:39, Salz, Rich wrote:
>> An OID allocation request was submitted well over a year ago.  The reason for the delay is that following the shutdown of the PKIX WG, control of the PKIX OID registry is being transferred to IANA.  IINM, the transfer is still not yet complete.
>
> You know, the really cool thing about OID's is that just about anyone can get an arc and that they are really just distributed opaque identifiers. (Kinda like XML namespace UIR's I suppose.)  I'm sure there are many folks who would volunteer if needed.

I'm well aware of that.

See https://cabforum.org/pipermail/public/2013-November/002333.html

-- 
Rob Stradling
Senior Research & Development Scientist
COMODO - Creating Trust Online